1983
DOI: 10.1107/s010876738300104x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wavelength-dependent measurements of extinction in an extended-face crystal of zinc selenide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1980), A36, 482-490] have been reanalysed with a view to explaining the unresolved discrepancies between theory and experiment present in the original analysis of the most severely extinguished reflections. The results obtained are shown to complement the recent findings of a wavelength-dependent study using the same crystal specimen [Stevenson & Barnea (1983). Acta Cryst.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1980), A36, 482-490] have been reanalysed with a view to explaining the unresolved discrepancies between theory and experiment present in the original analysis of the most severely extinguished reflections. The results obtained are shown to complement the recent findings of a wavelength-dependent study using the same crystal specimen [Stevenson & Barnea (1983). Acta Cryst.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…If r/(2g) >> 1 but sin 20 is sufficiently small then r sin 20/(2g) ... 1, with r* depending on both r and g, and if sin 20 is very small the crystal may even be classified as type II. The authors are not aware of any studies with extended-face crystals where the sin 20 factor has been included in the extinction model [with the exception of Stevenson & Barnea (1983) -hereafter referred to as SB], making its inclusion of particular interest.'}" When primary extinction effects are important Zachariasen (1967) predicts that r* should be replaced by = r* + 3r[r-r*]/(2~.…”
Section: Discussion and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…t The value of r is quite large (cf. Table 4 of Stevenson & Barnea, 1983a), as expected for such a perfect sample. We should note three points with regard to the extinction correction.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…We have demonstrated repeatedly the remarkable advantages of using extended-face imperfect crystals for accurate measurement of relative X-ray integrated Bragg intensities even in the case of very highly absorbing crystals (Harada et al, 1970;Mair et al, 1971;McIntyre et al, 1980;Stevenson & Barnea, 1983aStevenson, 1994). Briefly, these advantages include the following:…”
Section: Absolute Intensity Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 97%