2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2013.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wave resource assessment in Oregon and southwest Washington, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, correlations for the direction of the maximum directionally resolved wave power and directionality coefficient are not very strong, as shown in Figure 4e,f. For each of six wave resource parameters recommended by the IEC TS, the following model performance metrics were computed to show the model skills, which are commonly used in other modeling studies [24,26]. All of these metrics represent an average estimate of the difference between predicted and measured values over a defined period of simulation.…”
Section: Model Performance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, correlations for the direction of the maximum directionally resolved wave power and directionality coefficient are not very strong, as shown in Figure 4e,f. For each of six wave resource parameters recommended by the IEC TS, the following model performance metrics were computed to show the model skills, which are commonly used in other modeling studies [24,26]. All of these metrics represent an average estimate of the difference between predicted and measured values over a defined period of simulation.…”
Section: Model Performance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low correlation coefficient of 0 is caused by the higher-order moments of the variance spectrum. For θ and d θ , the low correlation coefficients are due to the uncertainties in both modeled and measured directional metrics [20,22,24]. …”
Section: Model Performance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A comprehensive analysis of expected wave conditions on the Oregon coast was conducted using seven years (2005-2011) of modeled wave conditions [33]. This analysis provided approximately 300 discrete sea state bins, characterized by significant wave height (Hs), peak period (Tp), and mean wave direction (Dp) [34], along with the probability of occurrence of each sea state.…”
Section: Wave Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For calibration purposes, the modelled and measured significant wave height data sets at the bottom mounted wave recorder area point were compared for the period from the 1 to 5 September 2012 with a model time step of 6 h. The model accuracy is assessed by calculating the root mean square error, bias and the correlation coefficient [7,21]. These values for various magnitudes of the Nikuradse roughness parameter are presented in the Table 2.…”
Section: Model Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%