2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wave Iterative Computation for Fractal Microstrip Patch Antenna

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 4 renowned feeding approaches were the “microstrip line, coaxial probe (both contacting schemes), aperture coupling and proximity coupling (both non‐contacting schemes)”; nevertheless, their patterns differ based on frequency 16‐18 . Moreover, they reveal poorer back‐radiation and XP features 19‐21 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 4 renowned feeding approaches were the “microstrip line, coaxial probe (both contacting schemes), aperture coupling and proximity coupling (both non‐contacting schemes)”; nevertheless, their patterns differ based on frequency 16‐18 . Moreover, they reveal poorer back‐radiation and XP features 19‐21 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18] Moreover, they reveal poorer back-radiation and XP features. [19][20][21] Commonly, the most well-known approaches for examining MPA were the cavity model, transmitting line model, and full-wave schemes. [22][23][24] The full-wave system is very flexible, precise and it takes care of the infinite and finite arrays, distinct components, random components, stacked, and coupling components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%