2019
DOI: 10.1029/2019jc015354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wave Groups Observed in Pancake Sea Ice

Abstract: Ocean surface waves propagating through sea ice are scattered and dissipated. The net attenuation occurs preferentially at the higher frequencies, and thus the spectral bandwidth of a given wave field is reduced, relative to open water. The reduction in bandwidth is associated with an increase in the groupiness of the wave field. Using Surface Wave Instrument Float with Tracking buoy data from the 2015 Arctic Sea State experiment, bandwidth is compared between pancake ice and open water conditions, and the lin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2b). The finding is in agreement with observations by Thomson et al [45] in the Arctic MIZ for milder wave conditions. Our measurements strengthens the argument that nonlinear wave mechanisms responsible for the generation of large waves (e.g.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…2b). The finding is in agreement with observations by Thomson et al [45] in the Arctic MIZ for milder wave conditions. Our measurements strengthens the argument that nonlinear wave mechanisms responsible for the generation of large waves (e.g.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The remaining images were manually analyzed and assigned an integer code on a scale of 0-12 to characterize the ice type. This categorization was introduced in Rogers et al (2018) and previously applied to observations from the Arctic Sea State Experiment in 2015 (Thomson et al, 2019; see their Table 1). The ice codes range from less to more solid ice, and can be broadly grouped as 0-1 for open water and possible grease ice, 2-4 for frazil ice, 5-8 for brash ice and small to medium-sized pancakes, and 9-12 for substantial pancake ice.…”
Section: Sea Ice Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common and established method considers the deployment of instrumentation in situ, providing surface truth of the sea ice motion under the influence of waves. Such instruments typically use either an Inertial Motion Unit (IMU, i.e., a combination of accelerometer, gyroscope, and magnetometer, together with some data fusion processing, e.g., Kohout et al [40], Rabault et al [41]), or a high-accuracy GPS [42,43] to measure the sea ice motion and compute wave spectra. Less common techniques are using pressure sensors to measure the wave-induced pressure fluctuation to derive wave observations [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%