Coastal Engineering 2008 2009
DOI: 10.1142/9789814277426_0312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wave Forces on Groups of Slender Cylinders in Comparison to an Isolated Cylinder Due to Non-Breaking Waves

Abstract: This paper presents results of large scale experiments with various cylinder groups in tandem and side by side configurations. The transverse and inline forces have been investigated in regard to the vortex shedding processes, and the influences of neighboring cylinders on the wave load of a single isolated cylinder are pointed out. Furthermore, the Co and CM coefficients as well as the drag force and added mass characteristics were investigated by the method of the least square fit for the cylinder groups wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(8 reference statements)
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to predict the wave loads on the pile-group, the laboratory approaches are usually adopted in which the wave load on a slender pile within a pile-group is calculated by multiplying the wave load on an individual pile with an experimentally determined force coefficient. Recently, Bonakdar et al [34] proposed the wave force coefficients to modify the Morison equation to predict the wave-induced force on a slender pile within a pile-group with various configurations, which were found to agree well with the experimental data in the literature [35,36]. In the present study, the wave force coefficients proposed by Bonakdar et al [34] are adopted to calculate the wave force for the slender pile within pile-group with the arrangement shown in Fig.…”
Section: Modeling Of the Bridge And The Vehiclessupporting
confidence: 68%
“…In order to predict the wave loads on the pile-group, the laboratory approaches are usually adopted in which the wave load on a slender pile within a pile-group is calculated by multiplying the wave load on an individual pile with an experimentally determined force coefficient. Recently, Bonakdar et al [34] proposed the wave force coefficients to modify the Morison equation to predict the wave-induced force on a slender pile within a pile-group with various configurations, which were found to agree well with the experimental data in the literature [35,36]. In the present study, the wave force coefficients proposed by Bonakdar et al [34] are adopted to calculate the wave force for the slender pile within pile-group with the arrangement shown in Fig.…”
Section: Modeling Of the Bridge And The Vehiclessupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The knowledge of this distance, as well as of the values of eroded sediment, is of practical use for the design of a scour protection system and the required spatial extent. around circular cylinders [16][17][18], which is partly transferred as a border of influence for global scouring processes [10]. The present jacket model has a spacing of ~14 D between the pile centers, which is far above a previously described critical distance of 6 D. The volume analysis presented in paragraph 3 proves that there is a significant influence on the global erosion for areas > 6 D for the present structure.…”
Section: Local Scour Around Individual Pilesmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Furthermore, it is reported that hydrodynamic interactions between individual circular piles are small if the distance between them exceeds six times the piles' diameter (see e.g. [16][17][18]). Bolle et al [10] transferred this knowledge to jacket structures, arguing that the distance was clearly above 6 D in their study and thus global scour does not have to be considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single isolated pile and 14 pile group configurations including side by side, tandem and staggered arrangements with gaps of up to three times the pile diameter (1 ≤ S G /D ≤ 3) were tested. The results were analysed by , , Hildebrandt et al (2008), Bonakdar andOumeraci (2012, 2014) and Bonakdar (2014). Some of the general conclusions drawn from these analyses are:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%