2016 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/ultsym.2016.7728829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wave equation based transmission tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare mWnet 1 and mWnet 4 with three neural networks: Automap, UNet, and FC-DenseNet, and two other traditional reconstruction algorithms that use different optimization methods: Gauss Newton CG [14] and L-BFGS [13] on a laptop with CPU Intel Core i5 8400 2.80GHz and GPU Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070. All the algorithms are tested with their optimal default settings, where the maximum iteration numbers for Gauss Newton CG and L-BFGS are 500 and 100, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We compare mWnet 1 and mWnet 4 with three neural networks: Automap, UNet, and FC-DenseNet, and two other traditional reconstruction algorithms that use different optimization methods: Gauss Newton CG [14] and L-BFGS [13] on a laptop with CPU Intel Core i5 8400 2.80GHz and GPU Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070. All the algorithms are tested with their optimal default settings, where the maximum iteration numbers for Gauss Newton CG and L-BFGS are 500 and 100, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, this approximation method has been combined with various optimization methods to accelerate the reconstruction (Wang et al 2019). However, this iterative optimization reconstruction strategy is sensitive to noise and needs regularization (Gemmeke et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%