1982
DOI: 10.23986/afsci.72093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Watersoluble phosphorus in Finnish mineral soils and its dependence on soil properties

Abstract: Abstract. Water soluble phosphorus ranged from 0.2 mg to 117.8 mg/kg in 104 surface soil samples studied. On the average, water extracted less P from the heavy clay soils (4.8 ± 2.2 mg/kg) than from the coarser clays (12.8 ± 4.6 mg/kg) and non-clay soils (13.3 + 7.2 mg/kg).Water extraction seemed to illustrate ''the effective" P status, it is that determined by the quantity and quality of sorption components in soil, soil pH and the content of organic carbon. These factors did not affect the amounts of P disso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
41
0
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
5
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Water extraction has been shown to illustrate the P status determined by the quantity and quality of sorption components in soil, soil pH, and the content of organic carbon (HARTIKAINEN 1982 a Further, it can be concluded from the equations of the isotherms B that a given desorption decreases the P concentration in a solution the more markedly the lower the buffer power of the soil is. Also HOLFORD and MATTINGLY (1976) have emphasized the importance of the buffering factor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Water extraction has been shown to illustrate the P status determined by the quantity and quality of sorption components in soil, soil pH, and the content of organic carbon (HARTIKAINEN 1982 a Further, it can be concluded from the equations of the isotherms B that a given desorption decreases the P concentration in a solution the more markedly the lower the buffer power of the soil is. Also HOLFORD and MATTINGLY (1976) have emphasized the importance of the buffering factor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The means and range of other properties in various soil groups as well as the methods of soil analyses are presented in a previous study (HARTIKAINEN 1982 a). The method for preparing the isotherms is described in the first part of this study (HARTIKAINEN 1982 b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency of vegetated strips in reducing dissolved phosphorus is dependent on the dynamic equilibrium between soil and dissolved phosphorus. Phosphorus is adsorbed by soil when the phosphorus concentration in soil water is higher than the equilibrium level and vice versa [27]. Generally, the effectiveness of vegetated strips in controlling transport of soluble contaminants is less than for strongly-sorbed chemicals because the reduction in water transfer across the buffer is generally smaller than the reduction in sediment transfer [28].…”
Section: Vegetated Strip Effects On Nutrients and Other Contaminantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result indicated that Al-P and the Fe-P are the most important sources of easily soluble P which are important for plant growth by supplying P to the soil solution. However, Hartikainen (1982) stated that Al-P has a dominant influence over Fe-P in maintaining P concentration in the soil solution in the first place. The contribution of Fe-P to maintain P concentration in the soil solution can be expected to become source of available P with decreasing Al-P content.…”
Section: Effects Of the Treatments On Ph Exchangeable Acidity And Almentioning
confidence: 99%