2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01586-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Watershed prioritization for soil erosion mapping in the Lesser Himalayan Indian basin using PCA and WSA methods in conjunction with morphometric parameters and GIS-based approach

Abstract: Watershed prioritization for soil erosion mapping for the Lesser Himalayan Indian basin using PCA, WSA method in conjunction with morphometric parameters and GIS-based approach Highlights:1. Watershed prioritization using morphometric parameters is the best technique for soil erosion mapping. 2. Soil erodibility assessment using GIS-RS integrated with PCA, WSA models. 3.Evaluation of sub-watershed hydro-geomorphological parameters are the most influential parameters for soil erodibility assessment. 4.The most … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coefficient of determination (R 2 ), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), percent bias (PBIAS) and RMSE-observations standard deviation ratio (RSR) have been used for goodness of fit between observation and final best simulation. The R 2 , NSE, PBIAS and RSR are 0.74, 0.73, −3.55 and 0.54 respectively during the calibration whereas in validation period values are 0.75, 0.69, 18.55 and 0.56 respectively [11].…”
Section: Sequentialmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The coefficient of determination (R 2 ), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), percent bias (PBIAS) and RMSE-observations standard deviation ratio (RSR) have been used for goodness of fit between observation and final best simulation. The R 2 , NSE, PBIAS and RSR are 0.74, 0.73, −3.55 and 0.54 respectively during the calibration whereas in validation period values are 0.75, 0.69, 18.55 and 0.56 respectively [11].…”
Section: Sequentialmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Various experiments has done using SWAT model to find out the amount of soil erosion yield & it effects on hydropower generation [11]. Estimation of soil erosion loss in these regions is often difficult due to the complex interplay of many factors such as climate, land uses, topography, and human activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basin relief refers to the difference in elevation between the highest and lowest points of any particular region (the source and mouth of a river in a watershed). It also refers to the topography of the drainage basin, which affects the ~ 21 ~ quality and speed of drainage in the river catchment (Kumar et al, 2021) [10] Basin relief is an essential component in understanding the denudational characteristics of the watershed and plays a vital role in the development of landforms, surface and subsurface water flow, permeability, and erosional characteristics of the terrain (Magesh et al 2011). The Neeru watershed lies between 801 m and 4294 m above sea level (Fig.…”
Section: Relief Aspect 531 Basin Reliefmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). The concave curves with low integral values demonstrate old, eroded, and extensively dissected landscapes; smooth and s-shaped curves crossing from the centre of the hypsometric curve diagram represent mature and moderately eroded landscapes; and convex curves with high integral values represent young and slightly eroded landscapes (Kumar et al, 2021) [10] . The HI value and curve provide valuable information about the watershed's erosional stages and the lithological, tectonic, and climatic factors that influence them.…”
Section: Slope Aspectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation