2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01682.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waterlogging and canopy interact to control species recruitment in floodplains

Abstract: Summary 1.The extent to which seedling recruitment contributes to local functional diversity depends on the environmental filters operating in a plant community. Classical community assembly models assume that habitat constraints and competition act like hierarchical filters with habitat filtering as the dominant one. Alternative models assume a synergic interaction since responses to environmental stress and competition may impose physiological trade-offs in plants. 2. River floodplains are an ideal system to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
50
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
6
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as the calculations of overlap for the different projections in relation to floodplain area revealed, suitable habitat for some vegetation types and river stretches will be available only to a very little extent. Since the hydrologic conditions act as only one abiotic filter besides others and biotic constraints such as dispersal limitation or competition further reduce the amount of habitat that can actually be inhabited (Donath et al 2003;Kotowski et al 2010;Radtke et al 2012), special emphasis concerning these species and river sections should be given from a nature conservation point of view. In any case, the partially large differences between the river sections clearly demonstrated that potential habitat developments need to be evaluated for each river stretch individually since differences in the flow regime, geomorphic structure of the floodplain as well as land use occur along the river.…”
Section: Hydrologic Changes and Alterations In Future Habitat Availabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the calculations of overlap for the different projections in relation to floodplain area revealed, suitable habitat for some vegetation types and river stretches will be available only to a very little extent. Since the hydrologic conditions act as only one abiotic filter besides others and biotic constraints such as dispersal limitation or competition further reduce the amount of habitat that can actually be inhabited (Donath et al 2003;Kotowski et al 2010;Radtke et al 2012), special emphasis concerning these species and river sections should be given from a nature conservation point of view. In any case, the partially large differences between the river sections clearly demonstrated that potential habitat developments need to be evaluated for each river stretch individually since differences in the flow regime, geomorphic structure of the floodplain as well as land use occur along the river.…”
Section: Hydrologic Changes and Alterations In Future Habitat Availabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These lower surfaces include channel bars, point bars, channel shelves, backswamps, sloughs, swales and oxbows (Hupp, 2000). Further, upland species may in some cases readily tolerate infrequent flooding of short duration, allowing these species to co-occur with or exclude flood-dependent species, preventing the development of a distinct floodplain vegetation (Shankman, 1993;Kotowski et al, 2010). Finally, relationships between flooding and vegetation composition may be profoundly affected by the relative flood tolerances of invasive species (Tickner et al, 2001;Cooper et al, 2003;Stromberg et al, 2007), many of which are favored by the high level of disturbance associated with floodplain habitats (Zedler and Kercher, 2004;Richardson et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Light availability is a limiting resource for understorey species' primary production (Lite et al 2005). Kotowski et al (2010), in their experimental study on waterlogging and canopy interactions as controls on floodplain plant species recruitment in the Netherlands, found that canopy presence prevented the establishment of understorey plant species, probably due to high light attenuation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%