2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Waterjet penetration simulation by hybrid code of SPH and FEA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most important is that the accuracy of SPH solution is not influenced by the arbitrary distribution of particles under any extreme conditions. So, thanks to its huge advantages in adaptability, straightforwardness, and implementation ease, this particle method originally invented for astrophysical applications 2,9,10 has been rapidly extended and applied to a vast range of applications, such as the multiphase flow, [11][12][13] explosion and underwater shocks, [14][15][16][17] penetration, [18][19][20] high-velocity impact, [21][22][23][24][25] and geophysics, [26][27][28][29] etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important is that the accuracy of SPH solution is not influenced by the arbitrary distribution of particles under any extreme conditions. So, thanks to its huge advantages in adaptability, straightforwardness, and implementation ease, this particle method originally invented for astrophysical applications 2,9,10 has been rapidly extended and applied to a vast range of applications, such as the multiphase flow, [11][12][13] explosion and underwater shocks, [14][15][16][17] penetration, [18][19][20] high-velocity impact, [21][22][23][24][25] and geophysics, [26][27][28][29] etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material models used for the mandible and bullet were the n MAT_PIECEWISE_LINEAR_PLASTI-CITY, which was n MAT type 24 in the LS-DYNA 970 code. The material properties of the mandible and bullet that were acquired from published literature (Daas et al, 2008;Ma et al, 2008) are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we also assume that X t ( ) is strictly increasing (the jet never retraces its path), 1 we can write (6) as …”
Section: Linear Inverse Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…given a model for the footprint and the beam path, to determine the generated surface, has been reported. Some of the most common methods are based on statistical approaches [5], finite element methods [6][7][8] or artificial intelligence methods [9]. Finite element methods have also been used to model overlapped footprints [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%