2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-92753-4_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Watercolour Rendering of Portraits

Abstract: Abstract. Applying non-photorealistic rendering techniques to stylise portraits needs to be done with care, as facial artifacts are particularly disagreeable. This paper describes a technique for watercolour rendering that uses a facial model to preserve distinctive facial characteristics and reduce unpleasing distortions of the face, while maintaining abstraction and stylisation of the overall image, employing stylistic elements of watercolour such as edge darkening, wobbling, glazing and diffusion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, these benchmark datasets have been used in a variety of ways: to include some stylisation results from examples taken from the benchmark [16], [17], [18], [19]; to provide appropriate test data as part of the optimisation of preset parameters for post-processing filters in BeCasso, an interactive mobile iOS app for image stylisation [20]; and to provide a competitive and common set of test images for a research course on image processing for mobile applications [21].…”
Section: Benchmark Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To date, these benchmark datasets have been used in a variety of ways: to include some stylisation results from examples taken from the benchmark [16], [17], [18], [19]; to provide appropriate test data as part of the optimisation of preset parameters for post-processing filters in BeCasso, an interactive mobile iOS app for image stylisation [20]; and to provide a competitive and common set of test images for a research course on image processing for mobile applications [21].…”
Section: Benchmark Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 8 shows the Pearson and Kendall correlation coefficients; the values confirm that general-purpose filtering approaches such as XDoG [42] and oil painting [48] are not affected by the increasing complexity across the benchmark levels. Although they are face-specific, watercolour [18] and engraving are also fairly robust since their renderings are not highly dependent on the face model, and their results are reasonable despite inaccurate face detection. The techniques with highest correlation to the levels are neural style transfer [40], which has a tendency to create more spurious facial features (e.g.…”
Section: Experiments 2: Quality Of Stylisation Across Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations