Abstract. -Why do parasites harm their hosts? Intuition suggests that parasites should evolve to be benign whenever the host is needed for transmission. Yet a growing theoretical literature offers several models to explain why natural selection may favor virulent parasites over avirulent ones. This perspective first organizes these models into a simple framework and then evaluates the empirical evidence for and against the models. There is relatively scant evidence to support any of the models rigorously, and indeed, there are only a few unequivocal observations of virulence actually evolving in parasite populations. These shortcomings are surmountable, however, and empirical models of host-parasite interactions have been developed for many kinds of pathogens so that the relevant data could be acquired in the near future.Aside from academic interest, the evolution of virulence has potential medical and agricultural ramifications that may provide evolutionary biology with opportunities for contributions to human welfare. For example, understanding the evolution of parasite virulence may help us design better vaccines, prevent the emergence of highly virulent strains in the future, and diminish the virulence of present pathogens. These potential applications notwithstanding, the usefulness of an evolutionary theory of virulence to social problems has not been demonstrated and is even doubtful in some cases. One promising area for contributions from evolutionary theory is in designing live, attenuated vaccines.Key words.-Evolution, microparasite, population biology, virulence, virus.Received April 10, 1994. Accepted April 12, 1994 Evolutionary biologists are becoming increasingly enamored of the idea that evolutionary thinking may contribute substantially to the alleviation of human health problems. Much of the fanfare has centered on applications of natural selection to disease (the Darwinian Medicine school; Profet 1991Profet , 1993Williams and Nesse 1991; Ewald 1994) but these applications of evolutionary biology are so far without obvious success in penetrating the fields of medicine. In contrast, a far more visible impact from evolutionary biology is the use of phylogenetic reconstruction to trace routes and sources of in-I