2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.imavis.2007.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

WaterBalloons: A hybrid watershed Balloon Snake segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their aim is to delineate cell borders using such techniques as: local greyscale thresholding followed by scissoring and morphological thinning [4], [5], scale-space filtering followed by binarization and morphological processing [6] or hexagon detection using shape dependent filters [7], [8], [9]. More sophisticated methods include application of watersheds [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], active contours [15], [16], genetic algorithms [17] or analysis of local pixel levels aimed at finding intensity valleys corresponding to borders between cells [18]. Several machine learning approaches have also been proposed by the team of Ruggeri, including: neural network [19], [20], Bayesian framework [21], support vector machines classifier [22] and genetic algorithm [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their aim is to delineate cell borders using such techniques as: local greyscale thresholding followed by scissoring and morphological thinning [4], [5], scale-space filtering followed by binarization and morphological processing [6] or hexagon detection using shape dependent filters [7], [8], [9]. More sophisticated methods include application of watersheds [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], active contours [15], [16], genetic algorithms [17] or analysis of local pixel levels aimed at finding intensity valleys corresponding to borders between cells [18]. Several machine learning approaches have also been proposed by the team of Ruggeri, including: neural network [19], [20], Bayesian framework [21], support vector machines classifier [22] and genetic algorithm [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tsai et al [8] replaced the thresholding step with k-means clustering into two partitions. Dagher and Tom [9] combined the watershed segmentation algorithm with the active contour model by using the watershed segmentation result of a down-sampled image as the initial contour of the snake for the segmentation of blood cells and corneal cells. Huang and Lai [10] also used the marker-based watershed segmentation algorithm to find an approximate segmentation, applied heuristic rules to eliminate non-nuclei regions, and used active contours to improve the nuclei boundaries in biopsy images of liver cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these methods focus on the segmentation of only the nuclei [5,6,9,10,12,13] for which there is relatively higher contrast around the boundaries. However, detection of the cytoplasm regions is also crucial because cytoplasm features have been shown to be very useful for the identification of abnormal cells [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bernander et al (2013); Malmberg et al (2014), and Selig et al (2015a) developed fast robust stochastic watershed algorithms based on a probability density function that can locate silent contours without wrong matches. There is also a group of more sophisticated approaches: applying Bayesian framework supported by simulated annealing for cell border location (Foracchia and Ruggeri, 2003) improved by statistical description (Foracchia and Ruggeri, 2007); exploiting active contours (Dagher and El Tom, 2008), snake-lets (Charłampowicz et al, 2014), level sets (Zhou, 2007), and wavelets (Khan et al, 2007). The data mining and rough sets theory found an application in the solution designed by Poletti and Ruggeri (2014); while Ruggeri et al (2010) used an artificial neural network to classify whether a pixel belongs to a cell body or boundary oriented at different angles; the genetic algorithm was exploited by Ruggeri and Scarpa (2015); Scarpa and Ruggeri (2015), who supported it with information about pixel intensities and regularity of cell shapes.…”
Section: Determination Of Cell Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%