2012
DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2012.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water Yield of Xitiaoxi River Basin Based on InVEST Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the 176,000 km 2 area utilized by Conway, 82.86 km 3 stated in Table 1 is equivalent to 45.6 km 3 , which is similar to the findings of Conway. Bastiaanssen et al [12] also reported an estimated water production of about 298 km 3 …”
Section: Water Balancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Using the 176,000 km 2 area utilized by Conway, 82.86 km 3 stated in Table 1 is equivalent to 45.6 km 3 , which is similar to the findings of Conway. Bastiaanssen et al [12] also reported an estimated water production of about 298 km 3 …”
Section: Water Balancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the 176,000 km 2 area utilized by Conway, 82.86 km 3 stated in Table 1 is equivalent to 45.6 km 3 , which is similar to the findings of Conway. Bastiaanssen et al [12] also reported an estimated water production of about 298 km 3 The estimated water yield volume of each sub-watershed is presented in Figure 6. Annual average water yield is 304.51 km 3 , but water yield shows large spatial variation ranging from 0.04 km 3 in Main Nile to 82.86 km 3 in Blue Nile.…”
Section: Water Balancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, quantifying the levels and values of these services has been proven difficult (Nelson et al, 2009). Currently, researchers modeled quantitatively the supply of ecosystem services in a specific area with ′ecological production functions′ -the degree of services provision depend on local critical variables (Chen et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2012). Although these methods are superior to those with the land cover and habitat assessment benefits transfer approach (Costanza et al, 1997;Konarska et al, 2002;Zhao et al, 2004;Turner et al, 2007;Li et al, 2010), few studies focus on the complicated spatial heterogeneity influenced by climate, vegetation, soil texture, terrain and human activities, especially the hilly areas where natural resources and geographic features are highly heterogeneous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%