2004
DOI: 10.21236/ada423120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water Vapor Retrieval Using the FLAASH Atmospheric Correction Algorithm

Abstract: Public reporting burden for tliis collection of infomiation is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instrucb'ons, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and compleb'ng and reviewing this collection of infomiation. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of infomiation, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Inf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the relative error (1%) of the ratio values derived from CIBR algorithm or APDA algorithm will cause large relative errors to water vapor content when W is very low (about 0.097/0.5=19%) and reduce to 10% when W exceeds 2g/cm 2 . This conclusion is consistent with that the weak absorption of 820nm is less sensitive to lower water vapor contents but more sensitive high water vapor contents [6]. Figure 3.…”
Section: Results and Analysissupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the relative error (1%) of the ratio values derived from CIBR algorithm or APDA algorithm will cause large relative errors to water vapor content when W is very low (about 0.097/0.5=19%) and reduce to 10% when W exceeds 2g/cm 2 . This conclusion is consistent with that the weak absorption of 820nm is less sensitive to lower water vapor contents but more sensitive high water vapor contents [6]. Figure 3.…”
Section: Results and Analysissupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The spectrum range of HJ-1A hypespectral imagery is from 450nm to 950nm, about 5nm in spectral resolution. The 940nm or 1140nm is relative better band for retrieving columnar water vapor content, which is employed in FLAASH software and in water vapor retrieval algorithm for MODIS data [3,6]. These channels cannot be used for HJ1A hyperspectral senor either because of large noise or non-existence band.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such situations, techniques such as FLAASH (Fast Line-of-sight Atmospheric Analysis of Spectral Hypercubes) 10 and QUAC (QUick Atmospheric Correction) 11 can provide atmospheric compensation. While less accurate than ELM, they have the significant advantage of not requiring in-situ targets of known reflectance values.…”
Section: Image Processing Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%