2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.03.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water vapor adsorption on chars and active carbons–oxygen sensors prepared from a tropical tree wood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(c) The relative pressure at which pore filling occurs was lower for the models with functional groups and was below the saturation pressure for models with functional groups. This finding was consistent with what has been observed in experiments. This is due to the greater interaction energy between water molecules and functional groups, and that leads to favorable nucleation of water clusters. (d) The hysteresis loop was smaller for models with functional groups as opposed to pristine models.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…(c) The relative pressure at which pore filling occurs was lower for the models with functional groups and was below the saturation pressure for models with functional groups. This finding was consistent with what has been observed in experiments. This is due to the greater interaction energy between water molecules and functional groups, and that leads to favorable nucleation of water clusters. (d) The hysteresis loop was smaller for models with functional groups as opposed to pristine models.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…One is the point charge models such as SPC, SPC/E, and ST2 models, while the other is the square-well site models such as the primitive model (PM) and the Muller and co-workers 5,6 models. The simulated adsorption isotherms of water on activated carbon show a distinctly vertical pore filling, while experimental studies show a slight adsorption at low relative pressures ( P / P 0 , where P 0 is the saturation pressure), a steep increasing (but not vertical) of adsorption isotherm at moderate P / P 0 , and a saturation at high P / P 0 . The common reason used to explain the difference between the simulation results and the experimental studies is that porous carbon contains functional groups; however, other factors such as pore width and length could also contribute to this difference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The 2-D effects would be better classified by criterion 2 above. Since evidence exists suggesting the physical properties of the adsorbed phase of such molecules in micropores are better described by solid-phase than liquid phase [35][36][37] , the apparent excluded volume may also be due to an incorrect density attributed to the adsorbed phase. The Gurvitsch volumes for CO2, iso-butane, and SF6 were not reported due to experimental equipment limitations.…”
Section: -Molecular Packing Effects Dictated By Long-range Structurementioning
confidence: 99%