2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2020.106840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water vapor absorption between 5690 and 8340 cm−1: Accurate empirical line centers and validation tests of calculated line intensities

Abstract: An accurate empirical list of about 58000 transitions is constructed for natural water in the 5690-8340 cm-1 near infrared region (1.71-1.20 µm). The new list represents an updated version of the list reported in S.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GEISA-2020 was updated using line intensities, air-broadening and -shifting coefficients provided from Mikhailenko et al [12], whereas the line positions were refined using the most recent version of their line list [13]. Note that local discrepancies due to erroneous broadening values of some H2O lines were found in these line lists and in GEISA-2015 (see for example residuals of the H2O line at 7804.6092 cm -1 in section 3.1.1), these lines were corrected in GEISA-2020 with calculated air-broadening parameters from Vispoel et al [14,15] were used to correct the incriminated lines (see details below).…”
Section: H2o (Molecule 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…GEISA-2020 was updated using line intensities, air-broadening and -shifting coefficients provided from Mikhailenko et al [12], whereas the line positions were refined using the most recent version of their line list [13]. Note that local discrepancies due to erroneous broadening values of some H2O lines were found in these line lists and in GEISA-2015 (see for example residuals of the H2O line at 7804.6092 cm -1 in section 3.1.1), these lines were corrected in GEISA-2020 with calculated air-broadening parameters from Vispoel et al [14,15] were used to correct the incriminated lines (see details below).…”
Section: H2o (Molecule 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the data update made for H2O (cf. previous section), the HDO linelist was also updated using line intensities and air-broadening and -shifting coefficients provided by Mikhailenko et al [12], and line positions which were refined using the most recent version of their line list [13]. As a result, 17,015 lines were updated in GEISA-2020 (from which 4468 are new lines not referenced in GEISA-2015).…”
Section: Hdo (Molecule 51)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Tests were also made with the most recent data of H2O in the 2019 version of the GEISA database [39]. In this spectral region, the GEISA2019 was updated using line intensities and air-broadening and -shifting coefficients provided in the H2O line list from Mikhailenko et al [40], whereas the line positions were refined using [41]. Note that local discrepancies due to erroneous broadening values of some H2O lines were identified in [40] and GEISA2015 (for the H2O line at 7804.6092 cm -1 for example), and some air-broadening parameters from GEISA2011 were reintroduced in GEISA2019.…”
Section: Absorption Due To H2o Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%