2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water use efficiency and evapotranspiration in maize-soybean relay strip intercrop systems as affected by planting geometries

Abstract: Optimum planting geometries have been shown to increase crop yields in maize-soybean intercrop systems. However, little is known about whether changes in planting geometry improve the seasonal water use of maize and soybean intercrops. We conducted two different field experiments in 2013 and 2014 to investigate the effects of changes in planting geometry on water use efficiency (WUE) and evapotranspiration (ETc) of maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] relay strip intercrop systems. Our resu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

7
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(43 reference statements)
1
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher LAI resulted from S treatment indicates optimum leaf expansion, which helped in better interception and utilization of sunlight, after that LAI of all sesame varieties gradually decreased in all S treatments. This pattern might be because of reduction in crop canopy and senescence of older leaves [36,37]. However, we noted that sesame plants with the S treatments attained higher LAI (Figure 2), which might be due to longer duration of green leaf area and delayed leaf senescence [38,39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Higher LAI resulted from S treatment indicates optimum leaf expansion, which helped in better interception and utilization of sunlight, after that LAI of all sesame varieties gradually decreased in all S treatments. This pattern might be because of reduction in crop canopy and senescence of older leaves [36,37]. However, we noted that sesame plants with the S treatments attained higher LAI (Figure 2), which might be due to longer duration of green leaf area and delayed leaf senescence [38,39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…To determine LAI, consecutive 5 and 10 maize and soybean plants, respectively, were destructively collected from all treatments. To measure the leaf area sampled plants, first we determined the total leaf width and length with ruler; then, by multiplying the total leaf width and length with coefficient factor of 0.70 and 0.75 for maize and soybean, respectively, we obtained the leaf area (Rahman et al, ). After that, the leaf area index of each treatment was calculated as the ratio of leaf area to ground area.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the samples were collected destructively at least 1 m away from the previous sampling within in the same sub‐plot. The maximum leaf width and length were measured by using a ruler, leaf area was calculated by multiplying the leaf width, leaf length and crop‐specific coefficient factor of .70 for maize (Rahman et al, ). For biomass accumulation (BA) and its distribution in different plant parts, six consecutive maize plants, excluding the five border plants, were destructively sampled from all the experimental blocks at BS, DS and PM.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%