2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water-Transfer Slows Aging in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Abstract: Transferring Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells to water is known to extend their lifespan. However, it is unclear whether this lifespan extension is due to slowing the aging process or merely keeping old yeast alive. Here we show that in water-transferred yeast, the toxicity of polyQ proteins is decreased and the aging biomarker 47Q aggregates at a reduced rate and to a lesser extent. These beneficial effects of water-transfer could not be reproduced by diluting the growth medium and depended on de novo protein s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Survival and cell viability in water have been studied extensively in the context of aging, life span extension, and calorie restriction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Transferring S. cerevisiae cells to water stops growth, slows aging, and dramatically increases life span [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54]. This phenomenon likely explains the long-term survival of M. pulcherrima in the liquid formulations tested here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Survival and cell viability in water have been studied extensively in the context of aging, life span extension, and calorie restriction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Transferring S. cerevisiae cells to water stops growth, slows aging, and dramatically increases life span [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54]. This phenomenon likely explains the long-term survival of M. pulcherrima in the liquid formulations tested here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Thus, as we began to analyze the phenomenon more systematically, it soon became clear that the central underpinning point of difference between the water-transferred stationary phase U. maydis and S. cerevisiae cells, simply lies in the fact that U. maydis cells are metabolically active in water and that the fungus respires, i.e., that it consumes oxygen. Compared to the behavior of S. cerevisiae whose response to water transfer is characterized by a highly reduced metabolic activity (an energy preservation mode) and by an extended lifespan [ 1 , 27 ], the observation that U. maydis is metabolically active even when incubated in pure water seems rather curious. However, we are not in a position to comment further upon this intriguing finding, except to point out that a more comprehensive understanding of the overall “terrain” of U. maydis water-transfer physiology is needed, before the biological meaning of the differences between these two fungi can be grasped better.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These environmental variables include a wide spectrum of factors, ranging from the fluctuations in the types and quantities of available nutrients through the occurrence of adverse conditions such as elevated temperatures, desiccation, flooding, high-osmolarity, acidity, etc., to the presence of very pernicious agents that are different forms of irradiation and toxic compounds. Within this remarkable range of factors, nutrient starvation might well be the most common stress experienced by microorganisms in their natural habitats, and many excellent lab-studies were done exploring this problem within different conceptual and experimental frameworks, including the most extreme form of starvation, namely “water-transfer” [ 1 ]—a term used to refer to the transfer of cells from a growth medium to pure water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations