Water stratification in the marine biome restricts vertical environmental DNA (eDNA) signal dispersal

Abstract

BackgroundThe utility of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding surveys to accurately detect species depends on the degree of DNA dispersal. Multiple marine studies have observed only minimal eDNA transport by horizontal water movement across small spatial scales, leading to the conclusion that spatially specific eDNA signals accurately resemble in‐field species assemblages along a horizontal axis. Marine communities, however, are also structured vertically according to depth. In marine environments displaying permanent water stratification, vertical zonation patterns may be more apparent and present on smaller spatial scales (i.e., meters) than horizontal community structuring. The scale at which eDNA signals differ along a vertical transect and the accuracy of eDNA metabarcoding in revealing naturally stratified communities have yet to be assessed.Methods and resultsIn this study, we determined the ability of eDNA metabarcoding surveys to distinguish vertically localized community assemblages. To test this, we sampled three vertical transects along a steep rock wall at three depths (0 m, 4 m, 15 m), covering two distinct communities that were separated by near‐permanent water column stratification in the form of a strong halocline at ~3 m. Using three metabarcoding assays, our eDNA metabarcoding survey detected 54 taxa, across 46 families and 7 phyla, including 19 fish, 15 crustacean, and 8 echinoderm species. Ordination and cluster analyses show distinct eDNA signals across the halocline for all three replicate transects, suggesting that vertical dispersal of eDNA between communities was limited. Furthermore, eDNA signals of individual taxa were only retrieved within their observed vertical distribution, providing biological validation for the obtained results. Our results demonstrate, for the first time, the need to take into consideration oceanographic (e.g. water column stratification) and biological processes (e.g. vertical community structuring) when designing sampling strategies for marine eDNA metabarcoding surveys.

A drop in the ocean: Monitoring fish communities in spawning areas using environmental DNA

“…This taxon was not detected in water samples, despite being detected in one larvae haul; therefore, while sampling depth is unlikely to have affected the majority of taxa, it may be a reason for some of the discrepancies in the detection of rare species. Thus, as eDNA exhibits sensitivity to vertical zonation in stratified water (Jeunen et al., 2020), multiple sampling depths may be advisable, depending on the taxa and life stages of interest.…”

Seeking life in sedimented waters: Environmental DNA from diverse habitat types reveals ecologically significant species in a tropical marine environment

“…Subtidal collections were performed by sampling water using a 5 L Van Dorn horizontal water sampler at two depths, 1 m (shallow) and 10 m (deep) from the water surface. We wanted to investigate whether depth structured the communities detected (Jeunen, Lamare, et al., 2019).…”

eDNA Captures Microhabitat Partitioning in a Kelp Forest Ecosystem

“…The scale of depth variation of eDNA signatures in these studies was multiple tens of meters, yet marine communities can partition along much smaller depth gradients in nearshore environments [23,24]. In one study, Jeunen et al [26] found fine-scale depth variation in eDNA signatures from samples separated by only 4 vertical meters. However, these samples were taken from a fjord characterized by a strong halocline and very low wave energy, both of which greatly reduce vertical mixing.…”