2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jssas.2020.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water status response of pineapple using destructive and non-destructive indicators and their relations in two contrasting seasons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These plants had the lowest fresh leaf biomass, fresh leaf yield, gel weight, and gel yield (Table 2). Similar effects occurred in succulent CAM plants such as pineapple (Ananas comosus; Ríos et al, 2020) and cactus pear (Opuntia spp. ; Zegbe and Servín-Palestina, 2021) when exposed to water deficit.…”
Section: Leaf Biomass and Gel Productionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…These plants had the lowest fresh leaf biomass, fresh leaf yield, gel weight, and gel yield (Table 2). Similar effects occurred in succulent CAM plants such as pineapple (Ananas comosus; Ríos et al, 2020) and cactus pear (Opuntia spp. ; Zegbe and Servín-Palestina, 2021) when exposed to water deficit.…”
Section: Leaf Biomass and Gel Productionmentioning
confidence: 64%