2016
DOI: 10.1039/c5cy01337b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water splitting reaction on Ce0.15Zr0.85O2 driven by surface heterogeneity

Abstract: The compositional and structural heterogeneity of a sample of Ce0.15Zr0.85O2 subjected to a two-step thermochemical water splitting reaction was investigated by means of X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) and High-Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy (HRTEM) analysis. High temperature treatment under N2 resulted in segregation of a Zr-rich monoclinic phase on one side and a Ce-rich cubic phase on the other. The treatment also led to a higher reducibility of the materi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study allows also to clarify and explain the behavior of Zr-rich compositions like Ce0.15Zr0.85O2. 27 Despite this latter composition is less thermally stable and shows a more significant surface segregation under nitrogen flow, the final composition at the outer part of the particles is similar to that observed for Ce0.85Zr0.15O2. Figure 7 summarizes the main steps of the transformation for both compositions trying to elucidate the reasons why ceria-rich and zirconia-rich materials show similar water splitting reactivity after thermal treatment in nitrogen and redox activation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This study allows also to clarify and explain the behavior of Zr-rich compositions like Ce0.15Zr0.85O2. 27 Despite this latter composition is less thermally stable and shows a more significant surface segregation under nitrogen flow, the final composition at the outer part of the particles is similar to that observed for Ce0.85Zr0.15O2. Figure 7 summarizes the main steps of the transformation for both compositions trying to elucidate the reasons why ceria-rich and zirconia-rich materials show similar water splitting reactivity after thermal treatment in nitrogen and redox activation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The main component (peak 1) at about 529.5 eV is associated with the cerium-zirconium oxide matrix, while the component centered at 531.5 eV (peak 2) can be ascribable mainly to surface hydroxyl groups. 44 The signal N1s at 399.9 eV ( Figure 5C) confirmed the insertion of nitrogen into the surface of the CZ85_N2 and the formation of a zirconyl oxynitride phase 27,46,47 In addition, the evidence of the same nitrogen peak on the CZ85_N2 surface after WS cycles (CZ85_N2_ws, Figures 5D) in the starting material (500 °C) is due to the nanometric nature of the powder and to the presence of extrinsic defects induced by the zirconium doping. 38 Besides, a small quantity of Ce 3+ could be generated by the reduction of Ce 4+ under the X-ray irradiation during XPS analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…XRD structural analysis indicates that supports present a cubic Fm-3m symmetry and the structure was retained during subsequent calcinations, not showing any phase segregation (spectra not shown). In Table I the catalyst crystal size, calculated over the (111) peak of ceria-zirconia solid solution using the Scherrer's equation, remains constant, thus confirming a high thermal stability of powders due to the preparation method and to the effect of lanthanum and neodymium co-doping (16,17).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The supports Ce 0.8 Zr 0.2 O 2 (CZ80) and Ce 0.8 Zr 0.13 La 0.5 Nd 0.2 O 2-x (LN_CZ80) were prepared with a surfactant assisted method as reported in (16) and calcined at 500°C/4h (fresh catalysts). Successively the powders were calcined at 800°C/3h (aged catalysts), impregnated with a nitrate nickel salt solution up to a metal loading of 3.5 or 7 wt.% and finally calcined at 800°C/3h.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%