2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcata.2016.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water splitting behavior of copper-cerium oxide nanorods and nanocubes using hydrazine as a scavenging agent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(43 reference statements)
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, binding energies of 8.14 and 6.5 eV were reported for electrons at the valence band maximum of stoichiometric 12 and nonstoichiometric CeO 2 . 11,49,50 These values agree with the reported ionization potentials (6.5 eV vs vacuum and 9.0 eV vs vacuum), which vary as a function of Ce 3+ content for CeO 2 films. 17,45 Importantly, the energy level alignment in Figure 1 predicts that the photoexcited electrons in C-343 can be transferred into trap states below the Ce 5d band edge.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, binding energies of 8.14 and 6.5 eV were reported for electrons at the valence band maximum of stoichiometric 12 and nonstoichiometric CeO 2 . 11,49,50 These values agree with the reported ionization potentials (6.5 eV vs vacuum and 9.0 eV vs vacuum), which vary as a function of Ce 3+ content for CeO 2 films. 17,45 Importantly, the energy level alignment in Figure 1 predicts that the photoexcited electrons in C-343 can be transferred into trap states below the Ce 5d band edge.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Our proposed band edges for CeO 2 , as shown in Figure , differ slightly from those in some reports but generally fall within the range of literature values. For example, binding energies of 8.14 and 6.5 eV were reported for electrons at the valence band maximum of stoichiometric and nonstoichiometric CeO 2 . ,, These values agree with the reported ionization potentials (6.5 eV vs vacuum and 9.0 eV vs vacuum), which vary as a function of Ce 3+ content for CeO 2 films. , Importantly, the energy level alignment in Figure predicts that the photoexcited electrons in C-343 can be transferred into trap states below the Ce 5d band edge. Our spectroscopic results (see below) strongly support this conclusion and confirm that the energy level diagram in Figure is reasonable.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The size is similar for all the Ce loads; likewise, the morphology did not change. However, in the NiH-Ce10 sample, some short CeO 2 nanorods can be distinguished (figures 2(c), (d)) [30]. As a detrimental effect of Ce excess, some Ni(OH) 2 layers are not completely exfoliated (see the size distribution data in figures S1-S3 of the supplementary The XRD results corroborate this fact, where Ce allows the exfoliation of Ni layers in a hydrothermal environment, and the doping decreases the size of the exfoliated nanoplates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HAADF image shows the transparency of the layers, confirming exfoliation, and the in-set EDS shows the composition. In figure 3(d), β-Ni(OH) 2 with 10% of the Ce load presents both morphologies: exfoliated hexagonal plates and short nanorod-like CeO 2 [30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the 2.5 Cu/Ti and 5.0 Cu/Ti samples thermally treated at 500 • C show a well-defined reduction peak that starts at 160 and ends at 210 • C; this peak is also related to the Cu 2+ → Cu + reduction. The shoulders observed for the 5.0 Cu/Ti 500 sample at 225 and 275 • C are associated with the continuous reduction from Cu + to Cu 0 species [21].…”
Section: Temperature Programmed Reductionmentioning
confidence: 86%