The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1986
DOI: 10.1021/es00147a010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water solubility enhancement of some organic pollutants and pesticides by dissolved humic and fulvic acids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

45
592
5
11

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,006 publications
(658 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
45
592
5
11
Order By: Relevance
“…A negative correlation was also observed between the DOC contents and the amounts of p,p 0 -DDT desorption (R = 0.805, p < 0.05). The DOC in soil can enhance the dissolution of organic compounds in soil (Chiou et al, 1986;Seol and Lee, 2000;Tao et al, 2004a). The most likely reason for this negative relationship between the DOC and the DDT desorption is due to the dynamic equilibrium between SOC and DOC in soils (Antoniadis and Alloway, 2002;Ben-Hur et al, 2003), indeed, a positive correlation between SOC and DOC was found in this study (R = 0.895, p < 0.01).…”
Section: Abiotic Pp 0 -Ddt Desorption and Its Relationship With Soilsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A negative correlation was also observed between the DOC contents and the amounts of p,p 0 -DDT desorption (R = 0.805, p < 0.05). The DOC in soil can enhance the dissolution of organic compounds in soil (Chiou et al, 1986;Seol and Lee, 2000;Tao et al, 2004a). The most likely reason for this negative relationship between the DOC and the DDT desorption is due to the dynamic equilibrium between SOC and DOC in soils (Antoniadis and Alloway, 2002;Ben-Hur et al, 2003), indeed, a positive correlation between SOC and DOC was found in this study (R = 0.895, p < 0.01).…”
Section: Abiotic Pp 0 -Ddt Desorption and Its Relationship With Soilsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…SOC includes both soluble and insoluble fractions of organic carbon, and the proportion of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in a soil is usually very small. Both solid organic carbon and dissolved organic carbon have to be taken into account for a proper description of the distribution of hydrophobic compounds in sediment or soil/water system (Chiou et al, 1986;Ben-Hur et al, 2003;Tao et al, 2004a). A negative correlation was also observed between the DOC contents and the amounts of p,p 0 -DDT desorption (R = 0.805, p < 0.05).…”
Section: Abiotic Pp 0 -Ddt Desorption and Its Relationship With Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrophobic organic contami- nants, such as naphthalene etc., have strong affinity toward the hydrophobic groups of the humic substances, and their adsorption onto the natural particles acts mainly on the organic layers of the natural particles. Therefore, earlier investigations [10,11,[42][43][44][45] showed that sorption of hydrophobic organic contaminants (HOCs) by soils and sediments is dominated by partitioning into relatively homogeneous, lipophilic, gel-like humic matrices, which can be recognized as a partition or dissolution process and has the linear adsorption features. A number of more recent studies [12][13][14][15][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55] , however, have indicated that such sorption often manifests substantial deviations from a linear partition model, provided that very low concentrations of HOCs are studied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ces composés étant peu solubles dans les eaux, les risques de pollution par ruissellement ou drainage sont donc limités. Leurs associations avec les substances humiques (Khan, 1972) peut cependant modifier leur activité entraînant notamment une augmentation de leur solubilité et donc de la pollution des eaux (WERSHAW et ai, 1969 ;CHIOU et al, 1986 ;CHIOU et al, 1987 ;AYELE et al, 1989 ;FABRE étal., 1990).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified