2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2016.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water softening by induced crystallization in fluidized bed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen et al (2016) applied the Amsterdam reactor in recirculating cooling water softening, and analyzed the influence factors, including the pH, height of the fluid bed, particle size, influent flow, and reflux ratio (ratio of the part of the effluent flow refluxed to influent flow and influent flow) on hardness removal. The effluent concentration of Ca 2+ reached a removal efficiency of 86.6% [11]. Hu et al (2017) studied the influence of factors including superficial velocity ( SV ), particle size ( L 0 ), and supersaturation ( S ) on the pellet growth rate of CaCO 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al (2016) applied the Amsterdam reactor in recirculating cooling water softening, and analyzed the influence factors, including the pH, height of the fluid bed, particle size, influent flow, and reflux ratio (ratio of the part of the effluent flow refluxed to influent flow and influent flow) on hardness removal. The effluent concentration of Ca 2+ reached a removal efficiency of 86.6% [11]. Hu et al (2017) studied the influence of factors including superficial velocity ( SV ), particle size ( L 0 ), and supersaturation ( S ) on the pellet growth rate of CaCO 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6 shows a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the particles discharged from the system after about 20 days of equipment operation, and their size is usually approximately 1.0–3.0 mm at the time of discharge [21]. Via testing and analysis, the content of CaO in the particles generated from the CPFBs in the Dingzhou Power Plant was found to be 51.10%, as shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid these problems and to satisfy the continuous need to have soft or at least moderately hard water for drinking, domestic and industrial uses, a pretreatment process for primary water resources is an essential issue. To achieve this purpose conventional and modern methods are adapted, starting from the use of lime and soda ash for removal of hardness in water treatment plants through precipitation (Burakov et al., 2018; Labban, Liu, & Chong, 2017; Nayar et al., 2015), to ion exchange process using ion exchange resins (Segev, Hasson, & Semiat, 2011), electro deionization process (Park, Song, Yeon, & Moon, 2007), electromembrane processes (Park et al, 2007; Seo et al., 2010), capacitive deionization (Lee & Choi, 2012), membrane and fluidized pellet reactor (Chen, Fan, An, Cheng, & Tan, 2016), fluidized‐bed homogeneous crystallization (FBHC) (Chen, Shih, & Huang, 2015), and adsorption (Pastrana‐Martínez, López‐Ramón, Fontecha‐Cámara, & Moreno‐Castilla, 2010) have been studied for the removal of a wide variety of ionic and molecular species from various water streams, including those responsible for hardness (e.g. Ca(II) and Mg(II) cations).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%