Water service provision and social equity in a South African rural district municipality

Abstract

Background: Equitable water governance is at the centre of sustainable development. Nevertheless, achieving this goal requires the application of social equity lenses with a focus directed to all dimensions of social equity. Social equity often places more focus on distributive equity, than other equity dimensions, which equally have a profound impact on ensuring universal water access (sustainable development goal 6).Aim: This study aimed to explore social equity dimensions in water service provision and how they affect water provision in rural municipalities.Setting: A rural district municipality in the Eastern Cape province, South Africa.Methods: A constructivist exploratory qualitative case study research redesign was used. Data were obtained through in-depth interviews, participant observation and focus group discussions from a purposefully sampled participant (n = 34) and data were analysed using thematic analysis.Results: Findings suggested that less attention was given to other dimensions of equity than distributive equity in the area under study, which undermines the district municipality’s efforts to eradicate disparities in water governance.Conclusion: The study concluded that achieving the Sustainable Development Agenda of 2030 in water service provision demands full attention to the procedures, quality and outcomes as they are intertwined and significantly impact overall societal goals in public service provision.Contribution: There is still a need to address disparities in water governance and ensure social equity in rural municipal water service provision. However, to achieve this, equal attention must be paid to all dimensions of social equity, which necessitates collaboration and participation from all stakeholders.

The Advancement of Sustainable Development Goal 16: An analysis of Performance Management Systems in South African Local Government

“…However, the performance of many municipalities in South Africa has exposed significant deficiencies in fulfilling their constitutional and legislative obligations. Various reports and studies, such as the one presented by the Institute for Democracy in South Africa (IDASA) to the portfolio committee on Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs (COGTA), have highlighted the persistent issues of poor service delivery and governance in most municipalities (Hutete & Sibanda, (2022). These issues include corruption, limited institutional capacity and skills among staff, lack of transparency, dysfunctional ward committees, lack of accountability by councillors and municipal officials, insufficient public participation in governance matters, noncompliance with municipal legislation and by-laws, failure to prioritize community needs, misalignment of Integrated Development Plans (IDPs) and budgeting processes, tensions between political and administrative sections of municipalities, and fragile financial viability (Hope Sr, 2021).…”