Water, sanitation and schistosomiasis mansoni: a study based on the Brazilian National Prevalence Survey (2011-2015)

Poague, Kasandra Isabella Helouise Mingoti; Mingoti, Sueli Aparecida; Heller, Léo

doi:10.1590/1413-81232023282.09692022

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 24 publications

(34 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The effectiveness of interventions in the school environment, compared to actions in the community, has been reported and should be considered. An ecological study using prevalence data from the INPEG (32) and national household and public and private school sanitation data showed that access to safe drinking water in schools was a protective factor for the disease (PRR 0.982; 95% CI 0.970 -0.995) (33). This reinforces that water contact patterns are influenced by the availability of safe water supply, sanitation, and health education (34)(35)(36).…”

Section: Analysis Of Recommendation 5 231 Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 88%

FioSchisto’s expert perspective on implementing WHO guidelines for schistosomiasis control and transmission elimination in Brazil

Menezes,

Montresor,

Jangola

et al. 2023

Front. Immunol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The World Health Organization (WHO) recognizes schistosomiasis as one of the Neglected Tropical Diseases targeted for global elimination in the 2030 Agenda of the Sustainable Development Goals. In Brazil, schistosomiasis mansoni is considered a public health problem, particularly prevalent among vulnerable populations living in areas with poor environmental and sanitary conditions. In 2022, the WHO published a Guideline encompassing recommendations to assist national programs in endemic countries in achieving morbidity control, eliminating schistosomiasis as a public health problem, and advancing towards interrupting transmission. The perspectives presented here, collectively prepared by members of the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation’s (Fiocruz) Schistosomiasis Translational Program (FioSchisto), along with invited experts, examine the feasibility of the WHO recommendations for the Brazilian settings, providing appropriate recommendations for public health policies applicable to the epidemiological reality of Brazil, and suggests future research to address relevant issues. In Brazil, the provision of safe water and sanitation should be the key action to achieve schistosomiasis elimination goals. The agencies involved in measures implementation should act together with the Primary Care teams for planning, executing, monitoring, and evaluating actions in priority municipalities based on their epidemiological indicators. Host snails control should prioritize judicious ecological interventions at breeding sites. The Information, Education, and Communication (IEC) strategy should be associated with water and sanitation and other control actions, actively involving school community. To identify infected carriers, FioSchisto recommends a two-stage approach of immunological and molecular tests to verify transmission interruption during the intervention and beyond. Praziquantel administration should be done under medical supervision at the Primary Care level. MDA should be considered in exceptional settings, as a measure of initial attack strategy in locations presenting high endemicity, always integrated with water and sanitation, IEC, and snail control. To assist decision-making, as well as the monitoring and evaluation of strategic actions, there is a need for an Information System. FioSchisto considers this systematization essential to make investments in strategic research to support the improvement of schistosomiasis control actions. Efforts toward schistosomiasis elimination in Brazil will succeed with a paradigm shift from the vertical prescriptive framework to a community-centered approach involving intersectoral and interdisciplinary collaboration.

show abstract

Section: Analysis Of Recommendation 5 231 Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 88%

FioSchisto’s expert perspective on implementing WHO guidelines for schistosomiasis control and transmission elimination in Brazil

Menezes,

Montresor,

Jangola

et al. 2023

Front. Immunol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The ecological design of the study, with the municipality as the unit of analysis, impairs including behavioral and other individual variables in the model, likely associated with infection. The mechanism of schistosomiasis transmission is complex and includes several conditioning factors [72]. Thus, disease control depends on preventive measures, such as early diagnosis and timely treatment, health education, surveillance and control of intermediate hosts, and basic sanitation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of environmental factors in reducing the prevalence of schistosomiasis in schoolchildren: An analysis of three extensive national prevalence surveys in Brazil (1950–2018)

Santos¹,

Oliveira

Mingoti

et al. 2023

PLoS Negl Trop Dis

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Over seven decades, Brazil has made admirable progress in controlling schistosomiasis, and a frequent question about the explanation for this reduction refers to the effect of improving environmental factors in the country. This article seeks to identify factors related to the change in the epidemiological situation of schistosomiasis mansoni infection by analyzing three national prevalence surveys conducted since 1950. Methodology/principal findings This is an ecological study analyzing an unbalanced panel of data based on national surveys and considering the municipality as the unit of analysis. The sample consisted of 1,721 Brazilian municipalities, in which a total of 1,182,339 schoolchildren aged 7–14 were examined during the three periods corresponding to each survey (1947–1953, 1975–1979, and 2010–2015). The percentage of municipalities with zero cases of schistosomiasis was: 45.4%, 54.2% and 73.7%, respectively for those periods. A zero-inflated Poisson regression model, with fixed and random effects, was fitted to assess the association between candidate factors and disease prevalence using a significance level of 5%. There was a significant decrease in disease prevalence between the first and last periods analyzed (RR 0.214, CI 0.184–0.249), with a protective association with access to sanitation (RR 0.996, CI 0.994–0.998), urbanization (RR 0.991, CI 0.989–0.993), and living in own households (RR 0.986, CI 0.983–0.989); and an inverse association with piped water supply (RR 1.010, CI 1.008–1.011). Conclusion The findings of this study indicate a decrease in the prevalence of schistosomiasis over seven decades in schoolchildren from the analyzed Brazilian municipalities, associated with environmental factors and social conditions. The increased access to piped water in the municipalities apparently triggers other ways of contact with unsafe water bodies, generating new transmission routes and suggesting the need for a systemic approach concerning contact with water.

show abstract

Effect of environmental factors in reducing the prevalence of schistosomiasis in schoolchildren: A panel analysis of three extensive national prevalence surveys in Brazil (1950–2018)

Santos¹,

Oliveira

Mingoti

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Water, sanitation and schistosomiasis mansoni: a study based on the Brazilian National Prevalence Survey (2011-2015)

Cited by 3 publications

References 24 publications

FioSchisto’s expert perspective on implementing WHO guidelines for schistosomiasis control and transmission elimination in Brazil

FioSchisto’s expert perspective on implementing WHO guidelines for schistosomiasis control and transmission elimination in Brazil

Effect of environmental factors in reducing the prevalence of schistosomiasis in schoolchildren: An analysis of three extensive national prevalence surveys in Brazil (1950–2018)

Effect of environmental factors in reducing the prevalence of schistosomiasis in schoolchildren: A panel analysis of three extensive national prevalence surveys in Brazil (1950–2018)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About