2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-020-03507-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water retention value predicts biomass recalcitrance for pretreated biomass: biomass water interactions vary based on pretreatment chemistry and reflect composition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…WRV has been pointed out as an index for indirectly indicating the porosity and cellulosic accessibility of plant biomass . From Figure , the WRVs of alkali-treated CS and RS are higher than those of untreated CS and RS, which corresponds to the previous study . The increased WRV usually indicates the incremental porosity and cellulosic accessibility to the enzyme .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…WRV has been pointed out as an index for indirectly indicating the porosity and cellulosic accessibility of plant biomass . From Figure , the WRVs of alkali-treated CS and RS are higher than those of untreated CS and RS, which corresponds to the previous study . The increased WRV usually indicates the incremental porosity and cellulosic accessibility to the enzyme .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Compared with the first two methods which require dry samples, the latter two methods can measure the original state of treated lignocellulose without drying . It was reported that the drying process could induce fiber hornification and lead to the shrinkage of all pores in lignocellulose to reduce cellulose accessibility. , In order to characterize the prototypical feature of treated crop straws, the WRV detection method which could predict the recalcitrance of the wet sample was employed, and new cryo-SEM was applied to observe the longisection and transection of untreated and treated samples. Corn stover (CS) and rice straw (RS) which are not only the top two crop straws in China, but also the second and fourth crop straws in the world, are selected as samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been used as an indirect measure of cell wall properties including overall hydrophilicity and porosity [ 43 , 44 ] and has been shown to be correlated with saccharification yield [ 35 , 45 47 ]. LF-NMR relaxometry provides more detailed information on the physical and chemical environment of water in the biomass [ 33 , 35 , 45 , 47 49 ]. This approach revealed that the presence of constrained water favored hydrolysis [ 45 , 49 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selig et al [ 8 ] studied the hydration and hydrolysis of cellulose Iβ, II, and III I at increasing solids loadings up to 30% and suggested that cellulose III I had the most restricted pool and that the changes in water distribution during enzymatic saccharification were more dramatic in cellulose III I than in celluloses Ib and II. More recently, Weiss et al [ 14 ] and Thomsen et al [ 37 ] investigated the effect of substrate modifications under enzymatic degradation by commercial cellulases on the biomass–water interactions on wheat straw and spruce. Their results showed that the notable effect of solids was due to both enzyme and substrate, and that increased water constraint by the biomass correlated with higher hydrolysis yields.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%