2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10706-013-9642-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water Retention and Compressibility of a Lime-Treated, High Plasticity Clay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, several researchers have reported values that are outside this range. Some of the values reported include 4% (Al-Mukhtar et al, 2010b;Bhuvaneshwari et al, 2013;Bhuvaneswari, Thyagaraj, Robinson, & Gandhi, 2010;Mavroulidou, Zhang, Gunn, & Cabarkapa, 2013), 5% (Eisazadeh, Kassim, & Nur, 2011a;Far, Kassim, Eisazadeh, & Khari, 2013), 6% (Kinuthia et al, 1999), 7% (Eisazadeh, Kassim, & Nur, 2011b), and 7.3% (Calik & Sadoglu, 2013). In the present study, the ICL for the soil under investigation came out to be 5.5%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 47%
“…However, several researchers have reported values that are outside this range. Some of the values reported include 4% (Al-Mukhtar et al, 2010b;Bhuvaneshwari et al, 2013;Bhuvaneswari, Thyagaraj, Robinson, & Gandhi, 2010;Mavroulidou, Zhang, Gunn, & Cabarkapa, 2013), 5% (Eisazadeh, Kassim, & Nur, 2011a;Far, Kassim, Eisazadeh, & Khari, 2013), 6% (Kinuthia et al, 1999), 7% (Eisazadeh, Kassim, & Nur, 2011b), and 7.3% (Calik & Sadoglu, 2013). In the present study, the ICL for the soil under investigation came out to be 5.5%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 47%
“…Overall the void ratio of the lime-treated soil increased with lime content. It is also interesting to note that unlike Mavroulidou et al [27], Cuisinier et al [12] did not observe a considerable improvement in the shrinkage behaviour of the lime-treated soil, even for the highest quicklime percentage used (5 %). However, they noticed an improvement in the swelling behaviour upon wetting, accompanied by a reorganisation of the soil fabric.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…During the long duration of the SWRC tests, the chemically treated soils are expected to experience continuous changes due to chemical reactions which are summarised in the following section; these can affect the treated soil in terms of both mineralogy and structure (fabric and bonding); both these factors affect the SWRC of the soil [36]. In general, lime-treated soils are less deformable when subject to changes in moisture content than the corresponding untreated soils due to chemically induced cementation bonding (weak or strong) and/or possible mineralogy changes [27]. It is also possible that ageing or dissolution of the bonds can occur during cycles of drying and wetting, gradually modifying the structure of the soil [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, Mavroulidou et al [16] obtained two drying curves for an untreated pulverised London Clay. The samples were compacted at a dry density of 1.43 g/cm 3 at 27% (dry of optimum) and at 32% (wet of optimum) water contents.…”
Section: London Claymentioning
confidence: 99%