1992
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.1992.301.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water Requirement and Crop Coefficient for Processing Tomatoes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Kc pan coefficient used was 0.65 for Class-A Pan and it was placed in a short green cropped and medium wind area (Allen et al 1998). Crop coefficients (kc) for tomatoes were 0.64, 1.03, 1.48 and 0.73 (André and Churata-Masca 1992), whilst for maize, it was 0.4, 0.8, 1-1.2 and 0.6 (Allen et al 1998) for vegetative, development, mid-stage and final stage, respectively. The wetted area was 30%, as a result of using tables for determining the values of the proportion of soil (%) wetted by various discharge rates and spacing for a single row of uniformly spaced distributors in a straight line.…”
Section: Irrigation Water Application and Evapotranspiration Determinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kc pan coefficient used was 0.65 for Class-A Pan and it was placed in a short green cropped and medium wind area (Allen et al 1998). Crop coefficients (kc) for tomatoes were 0.64, 1.03, 1.48 and 0.73 (André and Churata-Masca 1992), whilst for maize, it was 0.4, 0.8, 1-1.2 and 0.6 (Allen et al 1998) for vegetative, development, mid-stage and final stage, respectively. The wetted area was 30%, as a result of using tables for determining the values of the proportion of soil (%) wetted by various discharge rates and spacing for a single row of uniformly spaced distributors in a straight line.…”
Section: Irrigation Water Application and Evapotranspiration Determinmentioning
confidence: 99%