2018
DOI: 10.4067/s0718-95162018005001103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water relations and growth response to drought stress of Prosopis tamarugo Phil. A review

Abstract: Understanding the physiological mechanisms of response that allow plants to survive under suboptimal conditions such as drought stress is of particular interest, because of global climate change that threat the suitability of most terrestrial habitats for plant growth, as well as habitat disturbance of desert plants due to water extraction for human supply. Prosopis tamarugo Phil. of the Pampa del Tamarugal is frequently subjected to drought stress due to groundwater extraction for urban areas, mining industry… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this depends on the plant’s stomatal behavior [ 11 ], as plants fall into two categories: isohydric and anisohydric. Under water stress, isohydric plants tend to close their stomata earlier than anisohydric plants, which delay their stomata closure, as well as enhance gas exchange and let the leaf water potential decrease as the soil water potential decreases [ 5 , 14 ]. Isohydric plants generally experience a negative carbon balance, while anisohydric plants experiment low water potential, which may provoke hydraulic failure by xylem cavitation and embolism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this depends on the plant’s stomatal behavior [ 11 ], as plants fall into two categories: isohydric and anisohydric. Under water stress, isohydric plants tend to close their stomata earlier than anisohydric plants, which delay their stomata closure, as well as enhance gas exchange and let the leaf water potential decrease as the soil water potential decreases [ 5 , 14 ]. Isohydric plants generally experience a negative carbon balance, while anisohydric plants experiment low water potential, which may provoke hydraulic failure by xylem cavitation and embolism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2a) compared with high Na + accumulators TAM200/TUI, FRET2, and PUNJAB 85 under salt stress. Reduction in high Na + accumulator genotypes might be due to their lower root water potential and higher transport of plant hormone ABA from the root into the different organs of the plant, thereby inducing stomatal closure (Zheng et al 2001) which leads to less stomatal conductance as well as transpiration that is also detrimental as transpiration causes cooling effects in plants (Time et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These water relations have been directly linked to plant ionic and gaseous relations (Adolf et al 2012). Less stomatal conductance is also helpful in reducing transpirational water losses (Time et al 2018). Furthermore, less transpiration, as occurred in all wheat genotypes at higher salinity levels, might be also helpful in regulating water relations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the three lower limits of irrigation had no significant difference on Pn in the flowering and mature period but had a significant effect on Pn during the fruit swelling period. Because the fruit swelling period is a key period for the synthesis of muskmelon photosynthetic products and because plants need considerable water to grow, larger drought stresses under 60%F caused the plants to close more stomata of their leaves, which reduced transpiration [37]. The measured values also showed that the Gs and the Tr of 60%F were the smallest during the fruit swelling period, yielding the lowest value of Pn for 60%F.…”
Section: Lower Limit Of Irrigation Significantly Affected Pn During Fmentioning
confidence: 95%