2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water quality prediction using SWAT-ANN coupled approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, ANN was combined with PSO to create a new model in the prediction of laser metal deposition process [42]. Moreover, to enhance the water quality predictions, Noori et al [43] developed a hybrid model by combining a process-based watershed model and ANN. In terms of structural failure, Mangalathu et al [44] contributed to the critical need of failure mode prediction for circular reinforced concrete bridge columns by using several AI algorithms, including nearest neighbors, decision trees, random forests, Naïve Bayes, and ANN.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, ANN was combined with PSO to create a new model in the prediction of laser metal deposition process [42]. Moreover, to enhance the water quality predictions, Noori et al [43] developed a hybrid model by combining a process-based watershed model and ANN. In terms of structural failure, Mangalathu et al [44] contributed to the critical need of failure mode prediction for circular reinforced concrete bridge columns by using several AI algorithms, including nearest neighbors, decision trees, random forests, Naïve Bayes, and ANN.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies (El-Khoury et al 2015;Zhou et al 2015;C ̌erkasova et al 2018) have also obtained better performance for streamflow calibration. The reason for the low performance in predicting water quality parameters is the limited available data for a large number of parameters, highlighted in Hoang et al (2019) and Noori et al (2020). There are also greater uncertainties in nutrient data associated with errors in streamflow measurements, sample collection, storage, and analysis (Harmel & Smith 2007).…”
Section: Model Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The opposite effect was broadly observed in the case of forested buffer zones, as their presence limited nitrate concentration [14,39], although such influence was seasonally differentiated [14]. Another common research issue was the prediction of nutrient concentration as an effect of non-point pollution with the use of the hydrological models, such as the SWAT model, or even with the use of an artificial neural network [40][41][42]. Such investigations related to landscape dependence of nutrient dynamics were mainly focused on areas with the dominance of cereal crops [43,44], rice [45], and livestock farming, especially dominated by cattle, sheep, and poultry [27,28,44,46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%