2000
DOI: 10.3133/cir1213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water quality in the central Arizona basins, Arizona, 1995-98

Abstract: Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program. Water quality is discussed in terms of local and regional issues and compared to conditions found in the 36 NAWQA study areas, called Study Units, assessed to date. Findings are also explained in the context of selected national benchmarks, such as those for drinking-water quality and the protection of aquatic organisms. The NAWQA Program was not intended to assess the quality of the Nation's drinking water, such as by monitoring water from household taps. Rather, the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The surficial Delmarva aquifer system consists of fluvial gravels and sands of largely Pleistocene and Holocene age (Owens and Denny 1979) that generally contain lower amounts of POC, but some horizons are more organic‐rich than others. The sediments of the Central Arizona Basins aquifers consist of alluvial gravels, sands and clays that contain uniformly low amounts of POC (Cordy et al 2000), and this contributes to low DOC‐high DO concentrations in groundwater that may be hundreds or thousands of years old (Winograd and Robertson 1992). Thus, the presence or absence of bioavailable POC in a given aquifer (Figure 2) may have an effect on the observed interaction of DOC and DO (Tesoriero and Puckett 2011).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The surficial Delmarva aquifer system consists of fluvial gravels and sands of largely Pleistocene and Holocene age (Owens and Denny 1979) that generally contain lower amounts of POC, but some horizons are more organic‐rich than others. The sediments of the Central Arizona Basins aquifers consist of alluvial gravels, sands and clays that contain uniformly low amounts of POC (Cordy et al 2000), and this contributes to low DOC‐high DO concentrations in groundwater that may be hundreds or thousands of years old (Winograd and Robertson 1992). Thus, the presence or absence of bioavailable POC in a given aquifer (Figure 2) may have an effect on the observed interaction of DOC and DO (Tesoriero and Puckett 2011).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Aquatic invertebrates can also be affected by low oxygen levels, with tolerant worms (Oligochaeta: Martins, Stephan & Alves, 2008 ) and fly larvae ( e.g., Chironomus , Chironomidae: Lencioni et al, 2008 ) replacing sensitive mayflies (Ephemeroptera) and stoneflies (Plecoptera) near effluent outfalls ( Hamdhani, Eppehimer & Bogan, 2020 ). In fact, a previous study from the Santa Cruz and Salt Rivers reported low oxygen levels and only a few tolerant invertebrate taxa near effluent outfalls ( Cordy et al, 2000 ). However, wastewater treatment plants supplying these reaches have since been upgraded, and recent findings from the Santa Cruz River demonstrate a robust aquatic invertebrate community with few apparent dissolved oxygen limitations ( Eppehimer et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…, Webb et al, 2014 ). However, prior to wastewater treatment plant upgrades, water quality was generally poor and aquatic biodiversity was low ( Cordy et al, 2000 ; Walker, Goforth & Rector, 2005 ; Sonoran Institute, 2017 ). In particular, high water temperatures, low dissolved oxygen levels, and elevated concentrations of ammonia have been cited as the cause of low aquatic biodiversity in effluent-dependent streams ( e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geologic profile and climate of Arizona lend itself to naturally occurring valuable mineral deposits and fertile agricultural lands. Unfortunately, both of these factors plus the large and primarily rural nature of Arizona contribute to issues securing clean water resources that are safe for human consumption (Cordy et al 2000). The arsenic water quality information represented in the USEPA and National Water Quality Monitoring Council databases demonstrated water resources that exceeded the USEPA MCL of 10 ppb were widely distributed across the state, with most exceedances located in the central and southern regions (Figures 3–6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%