2012
DOI: 10.3133/sir20125214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water-quality assessment and macroinvertebrate data for the Upper Yampa River watershed, Colorado, 1975 through 2009

Abstract: Distribution of specific conductance, pH, acid neutralizing capacity, and concentrations of dissolved sulfate and dissolved manganese in stream water, by subwatershed, Upper Yampa River watershed, Colorado, 1975 through 2009 ...........26 7. Distribution of specific conductance, and concentrations of unfiltered sulfate, unfiltered total phosphorus, and total recoverable iron at Yampa River at Milner (site 151), by month, Upper Yampa River watershed, Colorado, 1975 through 2007 ........27 8. Location of water-q… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is for this reason that we used the in‐stream SC data during low‐flow conditions, when snowmelt was not contributing to stream discharge, to characterize the baseflow end‐member. In a survey of 815 samples collected from 328 groundwater wells located in a variety of geological formations and along different flow paths in the Yampa River watershed, SC ranged from 50 to 15,900 µS/cm, with a median concentration of 1170 µS/cm [ Bauch et al ., ]. This large range in SC concentrations serves as an example of the within‐watershed variability in groundwater SC concentrations that are present in large watersheds, such as those included in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is for this reason that we used the in‐stream SC data during low‐flow conditions, when snowmelt was not contributing to stream discharge, to characterize the baseflow end‐member. In a survey of 815 samples collected from 328 groundwater wells located in a variety of geological formations and along different flow paths in the Yampa River watershed, SC ranged from 50 to 15,900 µS/cm, with a median concentration of 1170 µS/cm [ Bauch et al ., ]. This large range in SC concentrations serves as an example of the within‐watershed variability in groundwater SC concentrations that are present in large watersheds, such as those included in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple subsurface flow paths contribute to streamflow at any point in time, and each of these flow paths has a unique chemical signal. For example, Bauch et al (2012) reported that SC ranged from 50 to 15,900 mS/cm among 815 samples collected from 328 groundwater wells in the Yampa River watershed. Given the variability in the chemical composition of groundwater, the use of well measurements as representative end-member concentrations can be problematic.…”
Section: Hydrograph Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Yampa River is located in northwest Colorado and flows primarily to the west from its headwaters in the Flat Tops Wilderness to the Green River near the Colorado/Utah border (Figure 1a). Geologic composition underlying the Yampa River is diverse (Figure 1b), and this may be reflected in water chemistry which ultimately affects the chemical composition of fish otoliths [50][51][52]. It is largely free flowing, with extreme changes in flow being driven by snowmelt [50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geologic composition underlying the Yampa River is diverse (Figure 1b), and this may be reflected in water chemistry which ultimately affects the chemical composition of fish otoliths [50][51][52]. It is largely free flowing, with extreme changes in flow being driven by snowmelt [50]. Flows generally begin increasing in April, with maximum flows in May and June, and then decreasing flows beginning in July.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%