2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water provisioning improvement through payment for ecosystem services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
30
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Absence of local hydrological monitoring: As with most of the water-related PES projects implemented in Brazil [14,45] and other countries in Latin America [8,46], Water Producer/PCJ started without baseline hydrological monitoring. When projects lack baseline data, calibration and validation of complex ecohydrological models are needed to explore FLR effectiveness through the simulation of scenarios [23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Absence of local hydrological monitoring: As with most of the water-related PES projects implemented in Brazil [14,45] and other countries in Latin America [8,46], Water Producer/PCJ started without baseline hydrological monitoring. When projects lack baseline data, calibration and validation of complex ecohydrological models are needed to explore FLR effectiveness through the simulation of scenarios [23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to ensure the sustainability of the food production system and to maintain ecosystem services in the Pantanal biome is linked to effective soil management, which requires a reduction in soil erosion rates [60,61]. Some examples of techniques to prevent or reduce soil erosion are no-tillage, contour farming, terraces, slope afforestation, crop residues, cover crops, and grass margins [17,55].…”
Section: Impacts Of Climate Change and Land-cover And Land-use Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is not effectively applied, it facilitates enforcement and gives landowners a pathway through which to restore or compensate for their "forest deficits" [9]. Furthermore, instruments such as payments for environmental services and economic-ecological zoning might control soil loss and increase water availability, as shown in Sone et al [60].…”
Section: Impacts Of Climate Change and Land-cover And Land-use Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the payment for ecosystem services (PES) can be a suitable mid-to long-term solution to provide soil and water conservation, guarantee forest restoration, river flow rate regulation, and improve water quality (Pagiola et al, 2007;Rodríguez Osuna et al, 2014;Zolin et al, 2014). The use of soil and water conservation approaches in watersheds been shown an excellent business, in the context of water production, as reported by Pires (2004) and Sone et al (2019).…”
Section: Planning For Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%