2017
DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2017.1339258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water polo: technical and tactical shot indicators between winners and losers according to the final score of the game

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same occurred in matches with balanced and unbalanced scores. A similar result is found in various other studies involving players of both sexes and at different performance levels 3,4,10,11 . However, a study with women's teams in the world championship demonstrated that H+ was different for medallist and non-medallist teams in the competition's preliminary phase 12 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same occurred in matches with balanced and unbalanced scores. A similar result is found in various other studies involving players of both sexes and at different performance levels 3,4,10,11 . However, a study with women's teams in the world championship demonstrated that H+ was different for medallist and non-medallist teams in the competition's preliminary phase 12 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These same results were found in a study with women's teams that participated in another edition of the same championship. In this case, the winners of the unbalanced matches scored more GH+ than the winners and losers of balanced matches and the losers of unbalanced matches 10 . This can be explained by the technical and tactical discrepancies present among teams with higher score differences, with the opposite occurring with well-matched teams in which the defensive marking is well conducted, making it more difficult to score goals in an H+ situation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…More specifically, past research in this scientific area reveal the interest of the scientific community in detecting the differences between winners and losers’ teams. Comparisons between offensive and defensive actions, goals or points, interactions between players, and assists are the most commonly used factors assessed by researchers in basketball ( Blake, 2015 ; Madarame, 2017 , 2018 ), football ( Lago-Peñas, 2007 ; Szwarc, 2007 ; Rumpf et al, 2017 ; Sarmento et al, 2018b ), female handball ( Ohnjec et al, 2008 ; Costa, 2018 ), and other collective sports ( Vaz et al, 2011 ; García-Marín and Argudo Iturriaga, 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second stage, we redesigned the observational tool and created an automatic data collection panel. After presenting and discussing the instrument at the 13 th Andebol Technical-Scientific Congress (Lisbon, 2016), the expert opinions were considered to improve the design of the tool and a registration panel was developed using the software Lince V 1.3 (Gabin, Camerino, Anguera, & Castañer, 2012), which had already been used in similar studies (García-Marín & Iturriaga, 2017;Lozano, Camerino & Hileno, 2016;Suárez-Cadenas, & Courel-Ibáñez, 2017;Trejo & Planas, 2018). To check the functionality of the instrument, it was used to collect data from the 2018 EHF Champions League Final Four matches.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%