“…Where the general governance network literature tends to examine conceptual or theoretical networks, the literature on watershed governance networks is able to examine specific governance networks (Imperial, 2005;Schneider, Scholz, Lubell, Mindruta, & Edwardsen, 2003;Weible & Sabatier, 2005). The research on watershed networks includes a wide body of literature on the benefits and requirements of cooperation and coordination in networks (Hirschi, 2010;Imperial, 2005;Jost & Jacob, 2004;Lubell & Fulton, 2008;Schneider et al, 2003;Scholz, Berardo, & Kile, 2008;Weible & Sabatier, 2005), planning (Dutcher & Blythe, 2012;Koontz & Johnson, 2004;Lienert, Schnetzer, & Ingold, 2013), knowledge diffusion and learning (Betsill & Bulkeley, 2004;Cash et al, 2003;Newig, Guenther, & Pahl-Wostl, 2010;Vignola, McDaniels, & Scholz, 2013), and system scaling (Cohen & Davidson, 2011;Norman & Bakker, 2009;Vignola et al, 2013), all of which are harnessed to build theories that apply to all governance networks. What the watershed governance literature continues to miss is a focus on implementation networks and the network reactions to policy decisions (Rykkja, Neby, & Hope, 2014).…”