2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2012.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water permeability of pigmented waterborne coatings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the water content. NMR Imaging has been proven to be an excellent tool to determine the distribution and the concentration of water in wood during drying (Quick et al 2007;Stenström et al 2014;Dvinskikh et al 2011a, b), and during uptake (Robertson and Packer 1999;Van Meel et al 2011;Donkers et al 2013). In situ determination of local moisture content has been achieved by portable NMR devices (Casieri et al 2004;Dvinskikh et al 2011b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the water content. NMR Imaging has been proven to be an excellent tool to determine the distribution and the concentration of water in wood during drying (Quick et al 2007;Stenström et al 2014;Dvinskikh et al 2011a, b), and during uptake (Robertson and Packer 1999;Van Meel et al 2011;Donkers et al 2013). In situ determination of local moisture content has been achieved by portable NMR devices (Casieri et al 2004;Dvinskikh et al 2011b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NMR spectroscopy and relaxometry analysis have similarly been used to characterize water molecules in latex films during the drying process and have identified three different environments for water: (1) isolated in the surfactant layers or aggregated in pockets; (2) interfacial layers between nanoparticles; and (3) dissolved in the polymer . In an NMR profiling study, the presence of interfaces between the polymer phase and inorganic pigments was determined to provide a pathway for diffusion and to increase the kinetics of transport …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the processing wastewater composition often varies considerably, also in terms of its quantities [1][2][3]. Typical components of the contamination load are the ingredients of parent paints, eg filling substances such as chalks (with major components: CaCO 3 and MgCO 3 ), barite (containing mainly BaSO 4 ), talk (containing mainly magnesium hydroxysilicate Mg 3 (OH) 2 Si 4 O 10 ), kaolin (containing mainly kaolinite -alkaline aluminium silicate (Al 4 [Si 4 O 10 ](OH) 8 ) and fused quartz and mica), silica (mainly SiO 2 ), mica (mainly alkaline aluminates such as: AB 2-3 (OH,F) 2 (Si,Al 4 O 10 ), where: A -mainly potassium, sodium and calcium, whereas Bmainly iron, magnesium, manganese, lithium and aluminium), titanium white (containing mainly TiO 2 ), siccatives, pigments, thickeners and surfactants, as well as defoaming agents [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Technological effluents generally contain significant concentrations of colloids and suspensions of a different degree of dispersion fastness, which is also a function of quantity and type of cross-linking agents added to semi-finished products, such as polyalcohols, polyurethanes, phenol-formaldehyde resins, urea-formaldehyde resins, amine-formaldehyde resins etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%