2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05257.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water loss through the lip, nail, eyelid skin, scalp skin and axillary skin measured with a closed-chamber evaporation principle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous study, nail water uptake and evaporation were observed to be fast: the nails approached 90% of complete hydration in half an hour after the nails were soaked in water 25. The effective diffusion coefficient of water in the nails could be up to 3 × 10 −7 cm 2 /s at 100% relative humidity28 and transonychial water loss was reported to be from 19 to 75 g/m 2 /h in healthy subjects 29–31. The present experimental setup mimicked the condition when the nails were occluded in practice—the ventral side of the nail was in contact with an aqueous environment while the dorsal side of the nail was in contact with the ethanol/water drug system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In a previous study, nail water uptake and evaporation were observed to be fast: the nails approached 90% of complete hydration in half an hour after the nails were soaked in water 25. The effective diffusion coefficient of water in the nails could be up to 3 × 10 −7 cm 2 /s at 100% relative humidity28 and transonychial water loss was reported to be from 19 to 75 g/m 2 /h in healthy subjects 29–31. The present experimental setup mimicked the condition when the nails were occluded in practice—the ventral side of the nail was in contact with an aqueous environment while the dorsal side of the nail was in contact with the ethanol/water drug system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…There was no significant difference between TEWL values of the two open chamber devices. For the scalp, as open chamber devices could not measure TEWL of a hairy region without shaving that part, it was not possible to compare both instruments for the scalp region (6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The closed‐chamber technique solves the drawbacks of open‐chamber instruments, including increases in relative humidity correlated with TEWL, because the instrument compares the ambient humidity with the humidity within the chamber after a short filling time of 10 seconds; the measurements can be performed at any measurement site and measurement angle; and the disturbance in measurement related to external or body‐induced air flows can be avoided . When compared with open‐chamber techniques, the measurement times are standardized and shorter (10 sec) , although at higher evaporation rates, the fixed measurement period might not represent steady‐state values since the instrument does not monitor changes in values over a period of time .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%