2018 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/isc2.2018.8656938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water leaks detection based on thermal images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IR detection was possible after 40 min of water leakage (i. e. 11.40 am for test1 and 2.40 pm for test2). This duration is comparable to that reported in [12]. For test1 datasets, at 11hmin am:i) all the experiential setup is shadowed by the neighboring buildings; therefore, the overall temperature of the soil was expected to decrease with time (see Fig.…”
Section: Experimental Datasupporting
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…IR detection was possible after 40 min of water leakage (i. e. 11.40 am for test1 and 2.40 pm for test2). This duration is comparable to that reported in [12]. For test1 datasets, at 11hmin am:i) all the experiential setup is shadowed by the neighboring buildings; therefore, the overall temperature of the soil was expected to decrease with time (see Fig.…”
Section: Experimental Datasupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Not limited by pipe size [20] influenced by the type of soil Ineffective for inhomogeneous soil. influenced by the moisture of soil [7] It is difficult to interpret the results [12].…”
Section: Ground Penetration Radarmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations