2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2022.111532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water jet impact damage mechanism and dynamic penetration energy absorption of 2A12 aluminum alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is visible from Figure 6 b,d,f that surface hardness also increases by increasing irradiation time. Microwave irradiation gives more time for cladding particles to bond with the surface, due to which the cladding surface is properly formed [ 42 , 43 , 44 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is visible from Figure 6 b,d,f that surface hardness also increases by increasing irradiation time. Microwave irradiation gives more time for cladding particles to bond with the surface, due to which the cladding surface is properly formed [ 42 , 43 , 44 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A slow corrosion rate is the most favorable for the corrosion resistance of 7075‐T6 aluminum alloy. [ 25–27 ] Effect of cutting depth on machined surface polarization curve…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A slow corrosion rate is the most favorable for the corrosion resistance of 7075-T6 aluminum alloy. [25][26][27] (2) Effect of cutting depth on machined surface polarization curve Figure 9 describes how cutting depth affects the polarization curve of T6 and T6-C aluminum alloy. As cutting depth increases, the anode current density of T6 aluminum alloy first increases then reduces, and then increases again.…”
Section: Electrochemical Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The range of R 2 is 0 to 1, and values near 1 indicate that the model is very good at explaining the variations in the output response. 52,74 The values obtained for R 2 for P ip , P avg , CFE, U, and SEA through this model were equal to 0.71, 0.88, 0.83, 0.88, and 0.80, respectively.…”
Section: Regression Modelmentioning
confidence: 87%