2005
DOI: 10.2166/wp.2005.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water institutional reforms: theory and practice

Abstract: This paper aims to set the stage with an outline of the conceptual, analytical and theoretical aspects of water institutional reforms and a synthesis of the main findings from the reform experiences of six countries: Australia, Chile, Morocco, Namibia, South Africa and Sri Lanka. Utilizing the latest developments in the literature on the subject, this paper presents the analytics of unbundling water institutions to show their endogenous and exogenous linkages, the transaction cost approach as a diagnostic fram… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
58
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
6
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the past water used to be referred as a free good, by which this has been replaced by new perspective that water can be treated either as social good or economic commodity (Randall, 1981;Milliman, 1959;Saleth and Dinar, 2005). First those who hold the view that water is a social good have looked into several factors including its necessity to life and perquisite of society social development (Araral, 2009;Brajer and Martin, 1990) and its association with agrarian and industrial revolution (Rose, 1990).…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in the past water used to be referred as a free good, by which this has been replaced by new perspective that water can be treated either as social good or economic commodity (Randall, 1981;Milliman, 1959;Saleth and Dinar, 2005). First those who hold the view that water is a social good have looked into several factors including its necessity to life and perquisite of society social development (Araral, 2009;Brajer and Martin, 1990) and its association with agrarian and industrial revolution (Rose, 1990).…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of these two evaluative criteria is to find the most suitable water institutional arrangements (Saleth and Dinar, 2005). It is well recognised that developing a weak institutional arrangements to regulate any watercourse rights can easily create a complex management problems.…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Well-known scholarship that addresses water institutions includes Rosegrant and Binswanger ( 1994 ), Barnekov et al ( 1989 ), Saleth and Dinar ( 2005 ), Meinzen-Dick ( 2007 ), Briscoe ( 2011 ), Beveridge and Monsees ( 2012 ) and Horne ( 2013 ). Most of these scholars partly focus on the benefi ts or disadvantages of water markets and provide insights about their utility in specifi c contexts as well as guidance on how they may be improved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our goal in this chapter is more modest, that is, to show how developing countries may or may not deploy market mechanisms in their water-supply systems and what this implies in terms of effi ciency, equity and sustainability. We do not necessarily provide specifi c recommendations about how to improve water markets; neither do we discuss best practice in terms of water institutions (see Saleth and Dinar 2005 ). Instead, we provide an overview of the key debates and major institutional underpinnings of watersupply sectors in developing countries and their potential performance under market or developmental state-oriented planning conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, many countries are reforming their water sectors to address growing water scarcity, conflicts between categories of users and the need for water for the environment [2]. In countries such as Australia and South Africa, wide ranging water law reforms have resulted in a 'radical shift in the manner in which water is conceived in legal terms and the regulatory frameworks that control its allocation and distribution' [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%