2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00128-007-9305-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water Hyacinths (Eichhornia crassipes) as Indicators of Heavy Metal Impact of a Large Landfill on the Almendares River near Havana, Cuba

Abstract: The Almendares River is central to recreational and other activities in Havana, Cuba. However, monitoring indicated significant heavy metal contamination in river sediments, especially below Calle 100, the largest landfill in Havana. This work extended previous sediment studies by determining complementary Cu, Pb, Ni, Cr, Cd, and Zn levels in indigenous water hyacinths (Eichhornia crassipes; EC) above and below the landfill. Pb, Cu, and Zn were significantly elevated in EC roots below the landfill and also cor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
1
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
7
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, intrinsic variability from site to site demands replicate and more samples be collected to obtain a holistic picture of ARG conditions in a river, although specific locations and river compartments have value in themselves. For example, previous work showed dry-season sediment sampling was very useful for identifying key pollutant inputs to a river (Olivares-Rieumont et al, 2005, 2007; Graham et al, 2011), but we show here that neither dry-season sediment nor water column data represent conditions in the wet-season. This is particularly important when one considers ARG transport downstream in each season.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, intrinsic variability from site to site demands replicate and more samples be collected to obtain a holistic picture of ARG conditions in a river, although specific locations and river compartments have value in themselves. For example, previous work showed dry-season sediment sampling was very useful for identifying key pollutant inputs to a river (Olivares-Rieumont et al, 2005, 2007; Graham et al, 2011), but we show here that neither dry-season sediment nor water column data represent conditions in the wet-season. This is particularly important when one considers ARG transport downstream in each season.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…The sites have been described previously (Olivares-Rieumont et al, 2005, 2007; Graham et al, 2011) and details are provided in Table 1. To make seasonal comparisons, samples were collected in April 2008 (dry-season) and the following September in the wet-season.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, early work showed heavy metals were very elevated in river sediments (16,17), especially Cu (copper), Pb (lead), and Zn (zinc), and we speculated that this pollution might also be affecting AR because of known links between heavy metals and AR development (18). Further, the watershed contains pharmaceutical production and other facilities and untreated domestic wastewater discharges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In order to assess the effect of excessive metal concentration in natural resources, it is necessary to assess the correct amount of nutrients needed for the metabolism of plants, so that the increased accumulation of certain elements in the organs could be attributed to their increased concentration in the surrounding environment (Gerloff and Krombholz, 1966;Pajević et al, 2002). The value of macrophytes as bioindicators in river systems is reflected in the fact that they always stay in one place, they are usually abundant, their sampling is easy, and taxonomic affiliation can be easily determined (Olivares- Rieunont et al, 2007). Due to the fixed positions of the rooted submerged and floating hydrophytes, as well as emersal species, they have a role as bioaccumulators and biofilters, which is manifested mainly in shallow waters, in coastal areas of rivers, canals and lakes, as well as in parts of the river where the water flows more slowly (Westlake, 1975).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%