2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2006.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water-holding capacity of wild and farmed cod (Gadus morhua) and haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) muscle during ice storage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
31
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
7
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The moisture and WHC of the fresh ground haddock (before addition of water and salt) was 82.6 ± 2.2 g/100 g and 83.3 ± 2.4%, respectively, similar to results reported by Aubourg and Medina (1999) and Olsson, Seppola, & Olsen (2007) on the same fish species. The WHC in the cooked fish minces added different amounts of salts are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Type and Concentration Of Salt On Water Holding Casupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The moisture and WHC of the fresh ground haddock (before addition of water and salt) was 82.6 ± 2.2 g/100 g and 83.3 ± 2.4%, respectively, similar to results reported by Aubourg and Medina (1999) and Olsson, Seppola, & Olsen (2007) on the same fish species. The WHC in the cooked fish minces added different amounts of salts are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Type and Concentration Of Salt On Water Holding Casupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Our results on the carp meat WHC prove the Olsson et al (2007) hypothesis that the whole system of fish meat production fro m the selection through the technology of rearing and feeding, and the manner of fish storage, may affect the WHC of fish. The results show that organic cultivation allows higher WHC than when carp is cultivated in a conventional system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The reduction of water holding capacity meant that an increased amount of water was exuded from the fish fillets. This lead to a loss of juiciness, which is important for both the industry and the consumer (Huss, 1988;Olsson et al, 2003;Olsson et al, 2007). For the gutted tilapia, an initial value of 90.02±4.44% and a final value of 55.87±3.15% were obtained on day 17 of storage in ice.…”
Section: Microbiological Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%