Hydrogen and Syngas Production and Purification Technologies 2009
DOI: 10.1002/9780470561256.ch6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water‐Gas Shift Technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From these data, we can conclude that 1 can be used to separate H 2 /CO 2 and O 2 /N 2 , and 1a can be used to separate CH 4 /H 2 . Separation of CO 2 and H 2 is important in water–gas shift and steam-reforming hydrogen production. , It can be inferred that both 1 and 1a show much higher O 2 and CO 2 adsorption capacities than those of H 2 , N 2 , and CH 4 , which can be attributed to the strong interactions with the groups in porous structures. Moreover, different hydrophobic and hydrophilic channels could influence the O 2 and CO 2 adsorption capacities, which cause 1a with hydrophilic channels (5.97 Å) showing higher adsorption amounts of O 2 and CO 2 than those of 1 with the hydrophobic channels (4.63 Å) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From these data, we can conclude that 1 can be used to separate H 2 /CO 2 and O 2 /N 2 , and 1a can be used to separate CH 4 /H 2 . Separation of CO 2 and H 2 is important in water–gas shift and steam-reforming hydrogen production. , It can be inferred that both 1 and 1a show much higher O 2 and CO 2 adsorption capacities than those of H 2 , N 2 , and CH 4 , which can be attributed to the strong interactions with the groups in porous structures. Moreover, different hydrophobic and hydrophilic channels could influence the O 2 and CO 2 adsorption capacities, which cause 1a with hydrophilic channels (5.97 Å) showing higher adsorption amounts of O 2 and CO 2 than those of 1 with the hydrophobic channels (4.63 Å) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kinetics analysis is useful in predicting the adsorption rate. It is also important in designing and modeling of the adsorption process Figures S10–S13 and Table show the results of kinetics and isotherm models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimated steam content was 36% at the raw gas inlet, corresponding to a steam-to-carbon ratio of 1.75, as calculated from the model outputs. The steam content in the gas feed to the burner was calculated by using both gasifier data (moisture content of biomass feedstock, steam flow to gasifier, and the online gas analysis at gasifier outlet) and the water gas shift equilibrium 40 at the actual gas temperature of the gasifier outlet.…”
Section: Wall Temperature During Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%