2001
DOI: 10.1177/104239101400934333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water for Manual Fire Suppression

Abstract: Water demand for manual fire suppression is analyzed. The Fire Point Theory is validated concerning fuel surface cooling effects and the critical water flow rate is determined and compared with previous investigations. It is shown that the critical flow rate is not the best use of resources. Therefore, the water flow giving the minimum total volume is determined. Data from real fires was compared with this experimentally-determined flow. There is a difference between experiments and real fires in terms of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under laboratory conditions, the 45% level has been found to be sufficient for total extinction [10] but that was not found to be the case in this study. Sa¨rdqvist and Holmstedt [45] report that in real fires, the total water application per compartment area is about 30-120 kg/m 2 and the application rates about 0.15-0.25 kg/m 2 s. In 360 s long simulations of three monitors, the total applied water mass was 10 kg=m 2 and the application rate 0.027 kg=m 2 s, far below the estimated real fire -values. The influence of the water suppression on the fire development was monitored by following the heat release rate (HRR) of the fire.…”
Section: Results: Influence Of Fire Intervention On Fire Developmentmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Under laboratory conditions, the 45% level has been found to be sufficient for total extinction [10] but that was not found to be the case in this study. Sa¨rdqvist and Holmstedt [45] report that in real fires, the total water application per compartment area is about 30-120 kg/m 2 and the application rates about 0.15-0.25 kg/m 2 s. In 360 s long simulations of three monitors, the total applied water mass was 10 kg=m 2 and the application rate 0.027 kg=m 2 s, far below the estimated real fire -values. The influence of the water suppression on the fire development was monitored by following the heat release rate (HRR) of the fire.…”
Section: Results: Influence Of Fire Intervention On Fire Developmentmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A high-speed camera with a resolution of 1024 × 1024 pixels was employed to capture images at a rate of 4000 fps. The size of field of view was set to 62 × 62 mm 2 . mm², with one pixel corresponding to 0.06 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small droplets with high speed possess high momentum, enabling both penetration and vaporization to occur simultaneously. Therefore, the ability to sufficiently cool flames to a non-sustainable temperature depends on factors such as droplet size, velocity, and droplet number density [2]. As a preliminary study on the cooling efficiency of sprinklers, many investigations have been carried out to measure the physical characteristics of droplets from fire sprinklers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Torvi et al [6] also bring up a new computer model, FIERAsystem, which simulates the geometry and burning condition of an industrial structure to calculate the water requirements for firefighting. Comparing with real fire cases, Särdovist and Holmstedt [7] suggest the water flow giving the minimum total volume as a measure to plan the dimensions of manual firefighting operations. The Fire Point Theory is also validated in their study to quantify the water demand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%