Water for All (Har Ghar Jal): Rural Water Supply Services (RWSS) in India (2013–2018), Challenges and Opportunities

Abstract

Sustainable delivery of drinking water of adequate quantity/quality sits at the core of rural development paradigms worldwide. The overarching goal of this study was to assess operational performance of rural water supply services (RWSS) in India to help authorities understand challenges/shortfalls vis-à-vis opportunities. Data on habitation-level coverage, aggregated by states between 2013 and 2018, were obtained from the National Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) database, against two water supply norms, namely, 40 lpcd and 55 lpcd (litres per capita per day). Results indicate that certain states are faring better (providing full coverage to over 90% habitations) while others are lagging (e.g., the north-eastern region, and Kerala and Karnataka in the South, for both norms). Several states yet fail to provide 55 lpcd to over half of their rural habitations. Overall, RWSS is marked by high spatial heterogeneity, inequality and recurrent slip-backs (decline in year-to-year habitation coverage) that thwart the basic motto of NRDWP— Har Ghar Jal (Water for All). Ground-level experience reveals a mismatch between theoretical systems’ output (40 lpcd and 55 lpcd) and on-site delivery, and highly intermittent services. Moreover, frequent scheme failure/abandonment adds to systems’ uncertainties and water users’ plight. A multitude of operational/organisational flaws, associated with government waterworks bodies, at different levels of systems’ hierarchy, limit RWSS operational performance. To that end, the concluding section argues for a demand-driven RWSS model (bottom-up systems’ governance) and highlights the core tenets of the same that call for integration of environmental, social, cultural, ethical and political perspectives in RWSS systems’ thinking/design.

A Lost Frontier or a New Gateway to Global Climate Action? The Afghan Leadership and the Revival of Afghanistan’s Mineral Sector

“…To that end, we believe that much of the success hinges upon how well the new leadership melds different spheres of development: (a) social and economic, (b) technological innovation and (c) environmental systems’ governance (Figure 5). The idea is to imagine an inclusive system’s governance, founded on an ecosystem of stakeholders, within a sphere of participatory action (Chaudhuri et al, 2020, 2023, 2024, 2021b). Potential stakeholders may include (but are not limited to), the public agencies, development organisations, financial institutions, think tanks, research groups, NGOs, intergovernmental organisations, universities/technical education centres/research organisations, UN offices and any other that could potentially help develop sound mining/mineral exploration protocols.…”

Water and sanitation services in India and Ghana: an assessment of implications for rural health and related SDGs

“…As per 2017-2018 estimates, a little over 10% RWSS schemes were planned but never took off, 17% remained incomplete, and 23% lacked status reports. The RWSS is also constrained by increasing operation and management weaknesses in the various government agencies at various levels and the lack of effective coordination of agencies in the sector (Chaudhuri et al, 2020). WaterAid ( 2021), reporting on the challenges of drinking water in India, indicates that the fragmentated nature of institutions in the water sector at both national and state levels makes it difficult to achieve effective coordination between the relevant agencies.…”

Conjoint assessment of rural water security and system sustainability in Nagpur, India

“…However, the realization of its goals is still faced with several constraints, including lack of stakeholder participation and limited funds (PRS India, 2018). Besides, several studies (Basu et al , 2021; Chaudhuri et al , 2020) suggest that, in spite of several reformative actions in the past decades, the sustainability of rural water supply services in India is faced with operational/organizational flaws. IRAP and CTARA (2018) point that the water supply schemes in India often do not consider the required institutional capacities, life-cycle costs and community willingness to pay, and this inability to foresee the system sustainability challenges acts as a major hindrance to achieving rural water security.…”