2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2013.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water equivalent properties of materials commonly used in proton dosimetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…28,30,39 This approach allows obtaining a reliable excitation and ionisation spectrum for any arbitrary condensed organic material, irrespectively of whether it has been measured or not. The optical ELF is extended to finite momentum transfers ( hk a 0) using the Mermin Energy-Loss Function -Generalised Oscillator Strengths (MELF-GOS) methodology, 38 which has proven to be very successful for handling condensed-phase materials, 32,38,[40][41][42][43] and particularly liquid water. 44,45 The main physical properties of the biomaterials studied in this work (needed for further calculations) are summarised in Table 1.…”
Section: Electronic Excitation and Ionisation Of Biomaterials By Swifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28,30,39 This approach allows obtaining a reliable excitation and ionisation spectrum for any arbitrary condensed organic material, irrespectively of whether it has been measured or not. The optical ELF is extended to finite momentum transfers ( hk a 0) using the Mermin Energy-Loss Function -Generalised Oscillator Strengths (MELF-GOS) methodology, 38 which has proven to be very successful for handling condensed-phase materials, 32,38,[40][41][42][43] and particularly liquid water. 44,45 The main physical properties of the biomaterials studied in this work (needed for further calculations) are summarised in Table 1.…”
Section: Electronic Excitation and Ionisation Of Biomaterials By Swifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WER is defined as the ratio of the mass thickness of water and the given material (in g/cm 2 ) that leads to the same beam energy loss . WER measurements were performed at OncoRay (Dresden, Germany) at two different proton energies (150, 200 MeV) with a high‐resolution multi‐layer ionization chamber (Giraffe, IBA Dosimetry, Schwarzenbruck, Germany) that measured the shift of the single Bragg peak along the central beam axis after penetrating the respective corset samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas Newhauser et al purposed to compute WET of gold, stainless steel and titanium by using numerical method [9]. On the other hand, Zhang et al adduce to compute WET of lead, aluminum and PMMA by using simple deterministic method that was derived from Bragg-Kleeman rule (BK) and Bethe-Bloch equation (BB) [10], [11]. Both studies done by Newhauser et al and Zhang et al revealed that the WET and WER calculation is dependent on proton energy intensity, density and thickness of materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%