2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevfluids.6.044003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water entry dynamics of spheres with heterogeneous wetting properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hurd et al studied the water entry characteristics of deformable elastomeric spheres, finding that the oscillations of these spheres during impact results in new types of nested cavities [14]. Watson et al examined spheres with heterogeneous wetting properties, finding that spheres which are partly hydrophilic and partly hydrophobic always have asymmetric cavities and drift away from straight-line trajectories [15]. Marston et al observed cavity formation for heated sphere impacts, finding that there is an inverted Leidenfrost effect when the sphere temperature is much larger than the boiling point of the liquid, which either produces a cavity with smooth walls or a double cavity structure [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hurd et al studied the water entry characteristics of deformable elastomeric spheres, finding that the oscillations of these spheres during impact results in new types of nested cavities [14]. Watson et al examined spheres with heterogeneous wetting properties, finding that spheres which are partly hydrophilic and partly hydrophobic always have asymmetric cavities and drift away from straight-line trajectories [15]. Marston et al observed cavity formation for heated sphere impacts, finding that there is an inverted Leidenfrost effect when the sphere temperature is much larger than the boiling point of the liquid, which either produces a cavity with smooth walls or a double cavity structure [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2019 b ; Watson et al. 2021). Increased hydrophobicity has also been shown to increase the force of impact on a sphere throughout the cavity-forming phase (Truscott, Epps & Techet 2012), though the effect is predominantly isolated to larger depths than focused on in the present work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impactor speed is plotted directly against time for these experimental cases in Appendix B. The splash and cavity formation for the flexible impactor, as seen in figure 2(b) or Supplementary movie 3, are similar to the rigid case during the slamming phase, though the cases with the 3-D printed noses sometimes feature larger splashes and enhanced cavity size, likely due to the higher surface roughness and lower wettability compared with the machined aluminium noses (Duez et al 2007;Aristoff & Bush 2009;Speirs et al 2019b;Watson et al 2021). Increased hydrophobicity has also been shown to increase the force of impact on a sphere throughout the cavity-forming phase (Truscott, Epps & Techet 2012), though the effect is predominantly isolated to larger depths than focused on in the present work.…”
Section: Peak Deceleration Of the Flexible Impactormentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Recently, many studies considering the effect of surface characteristics have been carried out [9][10][11]. Jia et al [12] examined the influence of surface wettability on the supercavitation process and found that, under the same conditions, the supercavitation size around a hydrophobic surface was significantly bigger than that around a hydrophilic surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%