1985
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9372(1985)111:5(714)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Water Diversion at Low‐Level Waste Disposal Sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16b). Th ._ource of this tritium is believed to be the old outfall from the French drain that drains the 49-trench area (Davis et al 1985). Ali other radionuclide p,'u'ameters reported to date are below minimum detectable concentrations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…16b). Th ._ource of this tritium is believed to be the old outfall from the French drain that drains the 49-trench area (Davis et al 1985). Ali other radionuclide p,'u'ameters reported to date are below minimum detectable concentrations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Figure A.12 presents the history of 3H concentrations in th_,se two wells since the beginning of the tumulus project. The source of this 3H is belie, cd to be the ouffall of a French drain that drains the 49-trench area (see Davis et al 1985) that is along strike with Tumulus I. Solid Waste Operations personnel have taken corrective action within the last year to extend this outfall to a surface drainage area so that the water from the ouffall will not seep into the ground and travel to the tumulus area.…”
Section: Radiological and Chemical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the influent groundwater is up-gradient from the source it is uncontaminated and can be disposed at any convenient point. Case Study 3-3 illustrates an example at WAG 6 at ORNL where a french drain was used successfully to manipulate the shape of the potentiometric surface (Davis et al, 1985;Davis and Marshall, 1988). However, a companion measure taken at this site to control infiltration was installation of a clay cap.…”
Section: Modifying the Hydraulic Gradient With Drainage Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%